USGS Home
SOFIA - SFRSF


HOME
Search the SFRSF site Learn about this site Upcoming events Resource Management Exhibits Science Displays
  ACME and SICS
  Historical Settings
  Hydrology
  Invasive Exotic Species
  Landscape Synthesis and Ecological Modeling
  Mercury
  Nutrients
  Our Coastal Ecosystems
  Sustainable Agriculture
Wildlife and Wetland Ecology

Presentations and Discussions Technology Briefings May 1999 Forum


SOFIA Home

Last updated: October 11, 2002
South Florida Restoration Science Forum

Wildlife and Wetland Ecology

How will research on fishes and wading birds guide and evaluate Everglades restoration?

Part 2: Aquatic Animal Ecology Research Program (continued)

water, aquatic animals, wading birds linkage illustration

Establishing Linkages Among Water, Aquatic Animals, and Wading Birds to Guide and Evaluate Restoration

(Click on any of the images below for a larger version.)

Effects of the C&SF Project:

  • Altered hydrology
  • Reduction in size of Everglades
  • Fragmentation of continuous marsh
  • Canals and levees as artificial habitats
  • Degraded water quality

natural system model
Historic Water Flow
managed system model
Current Water Flow

arrow pointing to the left

Variables:

  • Water depth
  • Hydroperiod
  • Timing of flooding & drying
arrow pointing to the right Wading Birds
arrow pointing downward

arrow pointing to the left and right
ELM
computer
Modeling
ATLSS
arrow pointing to the left and right
Wading Birds


Fishes & Invertebrates

Problem:  Historical data are unavailable to define restoration targets.
Hypothesis:  Habitat loss and hydrologic changes have reduced abundances.
Solution:  Use field data and modeling to establish restoration targets.

photo of throw trapping
Throw trapping
sampling map
Sampling Map


Field data

graphs
Size-structure
illustration
Species composition in canals and marshes
maps and illustrations
Crayfish distribution


Experimental Methods

photo of cages
Cages
photo of fish
Tagging


illustration
Levees as barriers
graph
Habitat use related to depth
photo of mesocosms
Mesocosms
arrow pointing to Management Implications
arrow pointing to Management Implications

Management Implications

Restored hydroperiods =

  • Higher animal densities
  • More species
  • Greater recruitment
  • Higher survival
  • More large fishes

Elimination of canals & levees =

  • Increased sheet flow
  • Natural species composition
  • Reconnection of wetlands


Wading Birds

photo of bird

Problem:  Some populations have declined by 90% since the 1930s.
Hypothesis:  Habitat loss and hydrologic changes have reduced food availability.
Solution:  Define and restore critical water depths, hydroperiods, and habitats.



Field data

photo of birds
vegetation map
arrow pointing downward
white ibis graph
arrow pointing downward
  • Vegetation type affects feeding site quality.


Experimental data

photo of ponds photo of wading birds
arrow pointing downward
white ibis graphs
arrow pointing downward
  • Maximum depth 28 cm for declining species.
  • Other species not as sensitive to deep water.


photo of fish photo of scientist throwing cage
arrow pointing downward
white ibis graphs
arrow pointing downward
  • The 3 declining species need high fish density and shallow water.

Management Implications:
  • Restoration of habitat diversity will improve feeding conditions.
  • Restored hydrology will benefit declining species most.


Next Next: Authors and collaborators



U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/sfrsf/rooms/wild_wet_eco/fish_bird/program.html
Contact: webmaster@sflwww.er.usgs.gov
Last updated: 11 October, 2002 @ 09:42 PM (KP)