USGS Home
SOFIA - SFRSF


HOME
Search the SFRSF site Learn about this site Upcoming events Resource Management Exhibits Science Displays
ACME and SICS

  Historical Settings
  Hydrology
  Invasive Exotic Species
  Landscape Synthesis and Ecological Modeling
  Mercury
  Nutrients
  Our Coastal Ecosystems
  Sustainable Agriculture
  Wildlife and Wetland Ecology
Presentations and Discussions Technology Briefings May 1999 Forum


SOFIA Home

Last updated: October 11, 2002
South Florida Restoration Science Forum

Southern Inland and Coastal System

Part 3: Vegetation Classification and Resistance


Vegetation Classification

Ground truthing
Ground truthing. (Click on photo for full-sized version.)
This vegetation-classification map (below) was developed specifically to serve as the basis for quantifying evapotranspiration, frictional-resistance, and wind-forcing processes in the SICS model. Twenty land-cover classes, derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery, were combined into seven vegetation classes and one water class using field information on vegetative composition and structure as well as extensive ground-truth observations. The classes are generalized to match the model scale, with each representing a broader variety of vegetation than the class name implies. The mangrove/buttonwood class, for instance, also represents other dense trees and shrubs. These vegetation classes are being further refined using more recent Landsat imagery and ground-truth data.

Vegetation classification map
Vegetation classification map. (Click on map for full-sized version.)


Vegetation Resistance

Velociy measurement
Velocity measurement.
Graph of depth vs. velocity
Resistance coefficient related to depth and (depth x velocity). (Click on graph for full-sized version.)
Resistance to water flow caused by plants and periphyton is expressed in the model by a mathematical expression involving an empirical coefficient. Water-surface slope, flow, velocity, flow depth, and detailed vegetation- description data, as seen below, are being collected to quantify the coefficient and determine its relation to vegetation type and density. In the illustration to the right, the coefficient Manning's n is plotted against the product of flow velocity and depth at two sites in Shark River Slough that have vegetation characteristics similar to Taylor Slough. These results demonstrate that the coefficient needs to be adjusted with changes in flow depth for model simulation.

    sample plot
    Sample plot.


sample vegetation description plot
Sample vegetation-description plot. (Click on graph for full-sized version.)


Next Next: Wind effects, Boundary and Internal Flows, and Topography and Bathymetry


U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/sfrsf/rooms/acme_sics/sics/vegetation.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 11 October, 2002 @ 09:42 PM (HSH)