USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > water resources investigations > report 87-4034 > introduction

Introduction

Abstract
>Introduction
Study Area
Aquifer Framework and Definitions
Transmissivity, Hydraulic Conductivity and Storage Coefficient
Hydrogeology
Ground-Water Flow System
Summary
References Cited
PDF Version
Southeast Florida (fig. 1) is underlain by materials of varying permeability from land surface to depths of 150 to 400 feet that provide most of the water used in the area. This body of materials is herein called the surficial aquifer system. In parts of Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, a highly permeable part of that aquifer system has been named the Biscayne aquifer (Parker, 1951; Parker and others, 1955). Adjacent to or underlying the Biscayne aquifer are less permeable, relatively unknown, by potentially important water-bearing materials which also are part of the surficial aquifer system.

Most previous work in southeast Florida had been concentrated in the populated coastal area. Drilling and monitoring activities were commonly restricted to zones used for water supply or to overlying zones. Hence, information concerning the characteristics of the western or deeper parts of the Biscayne aquifer and of sediments below the Biscayne aquifer in the surficial aquifer system were insufficient for present needs. Because of persistent increases in were demand from the surficial aquifer system in the highly populated and growing coastal area of southeast Florida and because of attendant concerns for the protection and management of the water supply, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the South Florida Water Management District, began an investigation to define the extent of the surficial aquifer system and its characteristics on a regional scale.

The overall objectives of the regional study are to determine the hydrogeologic framework, the extent and thickness of the surficial aquifer system and the aquifers within it, the areal and vertical water-quality distribution and factors that affect the water quality, the hydraulic characteristics of the components of the surficial aquifer system, and to describe ground-water flow in the aquifer system. Results of the investigation are planned for publication in a series of reports that provide information for each county or area as it becomes available. Broward County (fig. 1) is the first to be investigated in this regional study. Three reports were planned for Broward County, including a geologic framework report prepared by Causarás (1985), a water-quality report, and a hydrogeology ground-water report.

map showing location of Broward County, Florida
Figure 1. Location of Broward County, Florida. [larger image]

Purpose and Scope

This report describes the hydrogeology of the surficial aquifer system and ground-water flow in the aquifer system in Broward County, Fla. The purpose is to provide fundamental background information that is basic for qualitative or quantitative evaluations of the ground-water resource and the hydraulic response of the system to natural or artificial stresses. Specifically, the objectives are to: (1) define the surficial aquifer system and aquifers within it; (2) characterize hydraulic properties of the surficial aquifer system; and (3) interpret ground-water flow in the surficial aquifer system.

The study is intended to provide a broad countywide characterization of the surficial aquifer system rather than detailed site-specific or local information. An extensive field program of hydrogeologic test drilling, water-quality sampling, and aquifer testing was conducted during 1981-84. Most test holes in west and central Broward County were drilled to a depth of about 200 to 230 feet, but those closer to the coast were drilled much deeper, reaching 476 feet at two sites. At most sites, drilling fully penetrated the surficial aquifer system, reaching into the upper part of the underlying confining unit. Other data selected from existing geologic logs, historic water-level records, and aquifer or production well tests were used to supplement the field data.

Previous Investigations

Although a comprehensive water-resources investigation has not been made heretofore for all of Broward County, many investigations of selected topics or areas – almost exclusively in the eastern part of the county – have been reported. Parker and others (1955) gave information on the geology of the county; the occurrence, movement, and quality of ground water and surface water; and saltwater intrusion. Schroeder and others (1958) improved knowledge of the Biscayne aquifer with many shallow test holes and geologic sections in west Broward and Dade Counties and a contour map of the base of the aquifer. Studies of ground-water resources of local areas (fig. 2) have been reported by Vorhis (1948) for Fort Lauderdale, by Sherwood (1959) for Oakland and Hardee (1970) for the lower Hillsboro Canal area, and by Bearden (1972; 1974) for Hallandale and Hollywood, respectively. Sherwood and others (1973) synthesized the available data and much new information to form a better understanding areally of east Broward County. Other pertinent reports include a discussion of the chemical quality of waters by Grantham and Sherwood (1968), "Water and the south Florida environment" by Klein and others (1975), and the most recent description of the Biscayne aquifer and its hydrologic characteristics by Klein and Hull (1978).

map showing geographic areas of Broward County
Figure 2. Geographic areas of Broward County. [larger image]

Methods

Hydrogeologic test drilling was conducted at sites arranged to form intersecting lines across the county (fig. 3, table 1). A reverse-air dual tube drilling method, which circulates air (no drilling mud was used) downward in the annulus between the tubes and back to the surface in the inner tube with entrained cuttings and water, was used. The method alleviated problems of collecting representative geologic samples that mud-rotary methods often encounter in this area. The problems include lost circulation in cavities with loss of samples and "running water sands" that cause collapse of test holes. Pieces of rock layers and clean (free of drilling mud) samples of clastic materials were obtained from which inferences of hydraulic properties were made. Some of the rock samples were used for laboratory tests for porosity and hydraulic conductivity. Additionally, the samples were assigned a relatively accurate depth, and hydrologic observations were made of flow variations during drilling and at 10-foot intervals after completing each drill pipe length.

map showing location of test drilling sites and hydrogeologic sections
Figure 3. Location of test drilling sites and hydrogeologic sections (from Causarás, 1985).
Well numbers and site names are listed in table 1. [larger image]

After drilling each 10-foot length of drill pipe, air was circulated to obtain water from the aquifer. Circulation was continued, for several minutes if necessary, to obtain water as free from sediment as possible. Yields varied between 0 and 300 gal/min. Water samples were collected for analyses of specific conductance in the field and chloride concentration in the laboratory. Experience has shown that specific conductance and chloride concentration of water collected from circulation during drilling is similar, in most circumstances, to results from complete analyses of water collected by normal pumping and filtering techniques inside the drill rod and of water collected from finished wells at the test sites. The water produced by air circulation at a given depth is generally representative of the formation water at that depth. Profiles of specific conductance or chloride concentration with depth can then be constructed. These profiles have proven useful in revealing gross water-quality characteristics and making hydrologic or hydraulic inferences.

Previously available aquifer tests and specific capacities of production wells were compiled for estimating transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity in east Broward County. On the basis of the geologic sections prepared by Causarás (1985), inspection of geologic samples, and hydrologic observations made during drilling, a hydraulic testing program was designed to provide estimates of transmissivity or hydraulic conductivity of selected zones or materials at selected sites primarily in central and west Broward County. In some instances, multiple-well tests were made to determine storage coefficients.

Historic records of ground-water and surface-water levels were compiled from U.S. Geological Survey and South Florida Water Management District files to prepare water-level maps useful for interpreting ground-water flow.

Table 1. U.S. Geological Survey well numbers and informal site names for test sites.

[see figure 3 for location of sites]

USGS well number USGS site identification number Informal site name
(this report only)
Latitude Longitude Sequence
number
G-2311 260335 0802637 01 S-9 pump station
G-2312 261347 0802737 01 Twenty-Six Mile Bend
G-2313 261958 0804106 01 North Everglades central
G-2314 261952 0805002 01 North Everglades west
G-2315 261958 0803421 01 North Everglades east
G-2316 255732 0803256 01 South Everglades east
G-2317 255722 0802455 01 Snake Creek Canal west
G-2318 255724 0802036 01 Snake Creek Canal east
G-2319 260843 0802839 01 Alligator Alley east
G-2320 260846 0803542 01 Alligator Alley central
G-2321 260742 0802200 01 Markham Park
G-2322 260617 0801612 01 Plantation
PB-1428 262109 0801751 01 Hillsboro Canal west
G-2323 261938 0801215 01 Hillsboro Canal east
G-2325 261938 0800752 01 Hillsboro Locks
G-2327 255829 0801448 01 Miramar east
G-2328 255918 0800918 02 Hallandale well field
G-2329 261014 0805122 01 Alligator Alley Snake Road
G-2330 260844 0804159 01 Alligator Alley west
G-2338 260532 0805036 01 Southwest Everglades
G-2340 261458 0804947 01 Northwest Everglades
G-2341 261343 0801758 01 Cypress Creek Canal west
G-2342 261348 0801220 01 Cypress Creek Canal east
G-2344 261423 0800715 01 Pompano Beach well field
G-2345 260461 0801235 01 North Dixie well field
G-2346 255958 0805222 01 South Everglades west
G-2347 260507 0800856 01 Snyder Park

Acknowledgments

The author greatly appreciates the interest and support of the South Florida Water Management District in this cooperative program. Permission and access were given to locate most of the test sites on their right-of-way. In addition, they provided stage data for the water-conservation areas and for some of the canals and construction data for selected municipal supply wells. Also, Broward County, the cities of Fort Lauderdale, Hallandale, and Pompano Beach, and the Florida Department of Transportation gave site permission and access rights. Roy Reynolds of the Broward County Water Resources Management Division assisted in location of control structures and areas of controlled drainage in Broward County. Special thanks is given to the many municipal well-field operators for providing information on well construction and specific-capacity tests of production wells.


< Previous: Abstract | Next: Description of Study Area >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/87-4034/intro.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 05 January, 2005 @ 09:50 AM (KP)