USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > water resources investigations > report 78-107 > water quality

Home
Biscayne aquifer
Hydrologic system
Water quality
Ground-water withdrawal
Vulnerability of Biscayne aquifer
Future problems of potable supplies
Other drinking water sources
Summary & References
PDF Version

Water Quality

map showing locations of major well fields in southeast Florida
Figure 18. -- Location of major public supply well fields (Broward County Land Use Plan, 1977, p. 107; Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Resources Management facilities map, 1977). [larger image]

The chemical quality of the ground water in the Biscayne aquifer differs slightly from place to place; most differences in quality are related to the nature of the aquifer and local land use (Pitt and others, 1975, p. 44). In general, the water is hard, a calcium bicarbonate type, and contains different amounts of dissolved iron. Dissolved constituents in the ground water are influenced by rainfall and dry fallout, reaction with soil and aquifer material, application of fertilizers and pesticides, biological processes at the surface and within the aquifer, infiltration of wastes, chemical reactions among constituents, temperature, and pressure.

Ground-water quality in the vicinity of canals is also affected by canal water during dry seasons. The areas of this type of effect probably are small because of the seasonal reversals of hydraulic gradients between the canals and the aquifer. However, where large municipal well fields near canals are pumping continuously, such as the Miami-Springs Hialeah field adjacent to the Miami Canal, the induced infiltration of canal water to the aquifer is virtually constant and a wide zone of ground water is affected by canal water.

Chemical analyses of untreated water from selected large municipal well fields that withdraw water from the Biscayne aquifer (fig. 18), are shown in table 1. Samples were collected June 1975. Also shown are analyses of water from two test wells in interior parts of Dade County (fig. 18); both wells are remote from urban and agricultural development. The test-well samples were collected in October 1973 and October 1974. The analyses from the municipal wells represent ground-water quality affected by several years of pumping, urban runoff, periodic rainfall, canal drainage and canal-water seepage, septic-tank operation, and agricultural activities. The analyses from the two interior wells can be considered base-line water quality, not affected by development. In general the analyses are similar, except for low concentrations of sulfate and potassium in the remote test wells which are distant from urban and agricultural areas where fertilizers are used regularly. For comparison table 2 shows analyses of untreated water from four public supply well fields for 1941-42--during the early stages of urban growth (Parker and others, 1955, table 114).


Table 1. -- Analyses of untreated water from selected municipal well fields and from Everglades sites, 1973-75.

[Healy, 1977 and Pitt and others, 1975]

Constituent

(Concentrations in milligrams per liter, except as indicated)

Boca Raton well field Fort Lauderdale Fiveash well field Miami Preston well field Miami Orr well field Keys Aqueduct well field, south Dade County Northwest Dade test well Southwest Dade test well
Silica (SiO2) 7.5 9.7 7.0 4.3 3.2 7.1 5.3
Calcium (Ca) 80 100 90 92 100 98 81
Magnesium (Mg) 2.1 2.8 5.4 3.2 3.8 7.0 4.1
Sodium (Na) 18 19 38 16 13 17 14
Potassium (K) 1.4 1.5 3.0 1.7 5.7 0.7 0.3
Strontium (Sr) 0.75 .78 .87 .74 1.10 .89 .61
Bicarbonate (HCO3) 212 299 272 259 236 321 263
Sulfate (S04) 26 26 28 28 62 1.3 0.9
Chloride (Cl) 34 33 57 25 23 29 25
Fluoride (F) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2
Nitrate (N03-N) .01 .01 .01 .25 .00 .00 .00
Nitrite (N02-N) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
Nitrogen, organic (N) - - 1.1 - - .55 .89
Nitrogen
(Ammonia total NH4-N)
0.31 .63 1.10 .01 .01 1.20 .46
Iron (Fe) .08 1.8 .90 .03 .29 2.9 -
Phosphorus, total (P) - - - - - .02 .00
Dissolved solids
(residue at 180°C)
320 388 394 322 356 353 285
Total hardness
(as CaCO3)
210 260 250 240 270 280 220
Noncarbonate hardness
(as CaCO3)
36 15 27 28 76 13 9
Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 174 245 223 212 194 263 215
pH (units) 7.0 7.4 7.6 7.5 7.5 7 3 7.8
Specific conductance
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
500 619 663 540 569 561 465
Color (Pt-Co units) 7.5 45 55 5 5 - -
Temperature (°C) 28 - 28 28 - 24.3 24
Turbidity (JTU) - - 1 - - 9 16
Carbon, organic, total (C) - - - - - 15 9.0
Orthophosphate
total (PO4-P)
- - - - - .06 .00

Table 2. -- Analyses of untreated water from certain public supplies in southeast Florida, 1941-42.
Constituent

(Concentrations in milligrams per liter, except as indicated)

Boca Raton Fort Lauderdale Miami
(Hialeah - Miami Springs)
Homestead
Color (units) 10 110 85 5
pH (units) 7.2 7.3 6.8 --
Specific conductance
(K x105)
32.1 45.8 57.7 37.9
silica (SiO2) 9.6 11 7.4 2.8
Iron (Fe) 0.06 1.9 1.3 0.02
Calcium (Ca) 59 88 94 63
Magnesium (Mg) 3.1 3.3 9.6 6.5
Sodium (Na) 3.0 11 22 6.8
Potassium (k)   -- 2.2 0.4
Bicarbonate (HCO3) 168 266 266 218
Sulfate (SO4) 20 2.4 34 8.3
Chloride (cl) 18 18 38 10
Fluoride (F) 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2
Nitrate (NO3) .7 2.1 1.5 .3
Dissolved solids 195 294 370 212
Total hardness as CaCO3 160 233 274 184

One of the prime problems of water treatment for municipal supplies is the high organic content of the raw ground water. Color of the water in southeast Florida is related to the proximity of the thick organic peat soils of the Everglades. As indicated in table 1, color is high in the raw water from the Miami Preston well field which is a short distance downgradient from the areas of thick, organic soil in the Everglades. In contrast, the color at the Miami-Orr and Key West well fields is much lower because of the greater distance from the organic soils. The organic content in raw water cm become a problem in the removal of color. Chlorine used in the treatment process has been shown to produce halogenated organics (principally trihalomethanes) some of which may be carcinogenic (Rook, 1975).

Treatment of public water varies from chlorination only to a comprehensive, treatment which includes aeration, chlorination, coagulation, filtration, flocculation, pH control, softening, taste and odor control, recarbonation, and fluoridation.


Go back to Hydrologic system | Go ahead to Ground-water withdrawal



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/78-107/quality.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 04 January, 2005 @ 12:20 PM (KP)