USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > water resources investigations > report 78-107 > biscayne aquifer

Home
Biscayne aquifer
Hydrologic system
Water quality
Ground-water withdrawal
Vulnerability of Biscayne aquifer
Future problems of potable supplies
Other drinking water sources
Summary & References
PDF Version

Biscayne aquifer

Description

The Biscayne aquifer supplies all municipal water supply systems from south Palm Beach County southward (fig. 1), including the system for the Florida Keys which is supplied chiefly by pipeline from the mainland. It is a highly permeable wedge-shaped unconfined aquifer that is more than 200 ft (feet) thick in coastal Broward County thins to an edge 35 to 40 mi (miles) inland in the Everglades (fig. 2). The aquifer forms an important unit of the hydrologic system of southeast Florida (fig. 3), which is managed by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD).

The Biscayne aquifer is composed of limestone, sandstone, and sand. In south and west Dade County the aquifer is primarily limestone and sandstone, but in north Dade County, Broward County and south Palm Beach County the aquifer is primarily sand. Generally, the sand content increases to the north and east.

In Dade County (fig. 4) oolitic limestone and quartz sand form the upper part of the aquifer (Parker and others, 1955, Plate 4). The limestone is thickest along the coast, possibly as much as 40 ft., but the base is usually less than 20 ft below sea level. Inland, the oolitic limestone thins and then disappears beneath the peat soil of the Everglades. Oolitic limestone is usually cross-bedded.
map showing the areal extent of the Biscayne aquifer and adjoining shallow aquifers
Figure 1. -- Areal extent of Biscayne aquifer and adjoining shallow aquifers (Klein and others, 1975, p. 31). [larger image]
illustration showing idealized west-east section of the Biscayne aquifer
Figure 2. -- Idealized section of the Biscayne aquifer (after Parker and others, 1951, figure 3). [larger image]
Fine to medium grained sand fills solution cavities in the oolitic limestone. Parker and others (1955, p. 102) indicated that the solution cavities occupy a significant volume of the limestone, causing it to have high horizontal and vertical permeabilities. It is the high vertical permeability that permits rapid infiltration of rainfall to the water table. Where the limestone does not crop out, it is covered by quartz sand (fig. 4) which also permits rapid infiltration of rainfall.

In the east part of Dade County, extending north as far as Fort Lauderdale, the lower part of the oolitic limestone contains bryozoans (Hoffmeister, 1974, p. 39). The bryozoan section slopes upward to the west to emerge at the surface in the Everglades. Near the coast the bryozoan section is as much as 10 ft thick (Hoffmeister, 1974, p. 39); it thins to the west beyond the east boundary of Collier County. The bryozoan limestone is also riddled with cavities which contribute to its high horizontal and vertical permeability.

Below the bryozoan layer, the Biscayne aquifer is composed of hard limestone containing numerous cavities, often cavernous. Because of the extremely high permeability of this limestone, all large-capacity wells are completed in this part of the aquifer, generally 40 to 100 ft below the land surface. The cavernous section generally does not contain loose sand. The aquifer does, however, contain thin interbedded layers of hard, dense limestone in south Dade County, interior parts of Dade County and southwest Broward County. The dense layers probably are discontinuous and may locally retard, but do not prevent the vertical circulation of ground water. Beneath the coastal areas unconsolidated quartz sand separates the bryozoan limestone from the deeper hard limestone. The sand content increases northward which results in a corresponding decrease in overall transmissivity of the aquifer.

Parker and others (1955, p. 160) stated that the Biscayne aquifer "is the most productive of the shallow nonartesian aquifers in the area and is one of the most permeable in the world". He suggested that in east Dade County the transmissivity (hydraulic conductivity x saturated thickness = transmissivity) of the aquifer ranges from 4 to 15 million gallons per day per foot (Mgal/d/ft) (5.x105 to 2.0x106ft2/d). He applied a median value of 5 (Mgal/d/ft) (6.7x105 ft2/d) (Parker and others, 1955, p. 270). These values were obtained from aquifer tests using high-capacity wells, and by analyzing water-table contours adjacent to canals and in well-field areas. Storage coefficients from aquifer tests ranged from 0.047 to 0.247 (Parker and others, 1955, table 16).

map showing the locations of hydrologic structures and features of the South Florida Water Management District map showing surface geology of southeast Florida
Figure 3. -- Hydrologic structures and hydrologic features of the South Florida Water Management District. [larger image] Figure 4. -- Surface geology of southeast Florida (Parker and others, 1955, Plate 4). [larger image]

The approximate areal distribution of transmissivity of the aquifer is shown in figure 5. Along the coast and in the northern part of southeast Florida the aquifer is thickest, but because it is composed mainly of sandy material, the transmissivity in lower. In central and south Dade County the aquifer is thinner, but the hydraulic conductivity is high because of the cavernous limestone; the transmissivity is, therefore, high. The decrease in transmissivity to the west is due to the thinning of the aquifer.

The transmissivity ranges from about 3 Mgal/d per foot (4.0x105 ft2/d) in southeast Broward County to 0.4 Mgal/d per foot (5.4x104 ft2/d) in the northeast coastal Broward County (Sherwood and others, 1973, p 66-67) and in the vicinity of Boca Raton (McCoy and Hardee, 1970, p. 25). Values increase to about 4 Mgal/d per foot (5.4x105 ft2/d) (Sherwood and others, 1973, p. 66) in interior parts of northern Broward County. In Boca Raton, fine and medium sand extends to at least 60 ft below the surface. Permeable limestone at greater depth is discontinuous and becomes increasingly sandy north of Boca Raton (McCoy and Hardee, 1970, p. 7-11). Storage coefficients in Broward County are as high as 0.34 (Sherwood and others, 1973, p. 67).

map showing lines of equal transmissivity of the Biscayne aquifer
map showing distribution of soil types in south Florida
Figure 5. -- Lines of equal transmissivity of the Biscayne aquifer (from Appel, 1973, figure 8). [larger image] Figure 6. -- Distribution of soil types (after General Soil Map, Soil Conservation Service, 1962). [larger image]

Soil Cover

The soil that covers southeast Florida is of hydrologic importance because it controls the infiltration of rainfall, the operation of septic tanks, and indirectly relates to the quality of the ground water. The infiltration of rainfall is rapid in areas covered by sand or where soil is absent; infiltration is retarded in areas covered by marl or clayey soil.

Soil types in south Florida are shown in figure 6 (Klein and others, 1975, p. 11). Infiltration of rainfall is rapid through the sandy soil along the coast from central Dade County north into Palm Beach County. In east and south Dade County, oolitic limestone crops out or is covered by a thin veneer of sand, except in local elongate depressions where a few inches to a few feet of marl overlay the limestone. Peat and marl soils cover the Everglades. The ground water is highly colored in the area covered by or adjacent to peat soils. Septic-tank drainfields dispense effluent efficiently in sandy soil and in areas where they are cut into oolitic limestone.

Go back to Home | Go ahead to Hydrologic system



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/78-107/biscayne.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 04 January, 2005 @ 11:08 AM (KP)