USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > wri > 02-4050 > hydrogeology > hydraulic conductivity compairison: enr and wca-2a

Interactions between Surface Water and Ground Water and Effects on Mercury Transport in the North-central Everglades

By Judson W. Harvey, Steven L. Krupa, Cynthia Gefvert, Robert M. Mooney, Jungyill Choi, Susan A. King, and Jefferson B. Giddings

Home
Introduction
Hydrogeology of NC Everglades
- Geologic Setting
- Subaerial exposure and weathering
- Lithology of surficial aquifer
- Lithologic comparison: WCA-2A and ENR
- Geophysical logging
- Hydraulic conductivity: surficial aquifer
- Hydraulic conductivity comparison: ENR and WCA-2A
- Hydraulic conductivity comparison: other studies
Quantifying Recharge and Discharge
Use of Geochemical Tracers
Effect of GW and SW Interactions
Summary
References
PDF Version

Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity in ENR and WCA-2A

ENR cores had the largest variations in hydraulic conductivity at shallow elevations (10.6 to - 12.6 ft NGVD) as shown in table 7. The low vertical and horizontal K measurements at shallow elevations in the ENR indicate a restrictive layer or caprock, as suggested by Rohrer (1999). Although the restricting layer is common in limestone above 0 ft NGVD, it is not spatially continuous, as evidenced by many cores with Kv values higher than 1 ft/d. This discontinuous restrictive layer was observed during drilling operations at site M301. Here, the drilling fluids did not return to the surface for subsequent re-circulation, but emerged 18 ft away from the drill rig.

Core analyses found large variations in Kv in the consolidated sediments of the ENR boreholes. Less variation was seen in WCA-2A cores. A thin layer with very low Kv (0.001 - 0.1 ft/d) was found to overlie a layer of high Kh and Kv at sites MP1, MOP1, and MOP2. The elevation of these restricted flow/high flow layers varies at each site; the restrictive layer was between 5.9 and -7.5 ft NGVD and the high flow layer was between -4.6 and -15.9 ft NGVD. The layers of high hydraulic conductivity act as preferential flow paths encouraging horizontal flow because of the overlying restrictive layer. When this restricting layer is eroded or fractured, a preferential pathway for vertical transport of water and its constituents is created because the Kv is much higher than the Kh. The vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity and porosity for two shallow layers in ENR sites MOP1, MOP2, and MP1 are shown in table 8. The extreme differences in Kv at the different elevations at these sites can be seen clearly in table 8.

Table 7. Hydraulic conductivity determined from core samples beneath Everglades Nutrient Removal (ENR) project and Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A), north-central Everglades, south Florida

[1929 NGVD, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 in feet; K, hydraulic conductivity; ft/d, feet per day]

Site
Name

Sample
elevation
(1929 NGVD)

Vertical K
(ft/d)

Maximum
horizontal K
(ft/d)

Minimum
horizontal K
(ft/d)

Porosity (percent)

MP1

-0.9 to -5.9

0.002

0.03

0.01

11

MP2

10.6 to 5.6

0.68

20

13

11

MP3

2.2 to -2.8

6.5

3.4

3.0

9

MOP1

-6.5 to -7.5

0.12

77

0.31

16

MOP2

0.4 to -4.6

3,100

690

98

22

M203

0.63 to -4.4

100

130

110

22

S10C

-7.6 to -12.6

16

140

29

24

 

Table 8. Hydraulic conductivity compared in two layers at several sites in Everglades Nutrient Removal (ENR) project, north-central Everglades, south Florida

[1929 NGVD, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 in feet; K, hydraulic conductivity;
ft/d, feet per day; —, not applicable]

Site
Name

Sample elevation
(1929 NGVD)

Vertical K
(ft/d)

Maximum
horizontal K
(ft/d)

Minimum
horizontal K
(ft/d)

Porosity (percent)

MOP1

-6.5 to -7.5

0.12

77

0.31

16

MOP1

-7.5 to -12.5

3,400

-

-

29

MOP2

5.9 to 0.9

0.04

20

17

16

MOP2

-4.6 to -9.6

1,000

550

470

24

MP1

-0.9 to -5.9

0.002

0.03

0.01

11

MP1

-10.9 to -15.9

400

260

250

26

A variety of methods was used to estimate the average hydraulic conductivity of the peat. The methodology is addressed by Harvey and others (2000). In the ENR, the K of the peat is two orders of magnitude less than the K of layer 2 (table 9). In WCA-2A, the K of the peat also is appreciably less than the K of layer 2.

Table 9. Hydraulic conductivity of peat, peat-to-rock transition zone, and shallow underlying sand layer at Everglades Nutrient Removal (ENR) project and Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A), north-central Everglades, south Florida

[K, hydraulic conductivity; ft/d, feet per day; ft, feet; cm/d, centimeter per day; —, not applicable]

Area

Sediment
Layer

Approximate sediment depth (cm)

Approximate sediment depth
(ft)

Mean K
(cm/d)

Mean K
(ft/d)

ENR

Peat and transition layer

105

3.4

8.1

0.3

WCA-2A

Peat and transition layer

131

4.3

43

1.4

 

Underlying sand

-

-

270

8.9

Properties of the core samples, such as the silica/calcium carbonate content, color, and fossil content, were used to identify the formation and Q series of the sediments. Quartz content of these four boreholes varied greatly by both site and elevation as shown in table 10. These differences indicate changing depositional environments. As stated previously, shallow water marine carbonates and siliciclastic material dominate the Quaternary and portions of the Pleistocene deposits in south Florida. The lithology of the core samples from WCA-2A sites E-1, F-1, F-4 and ENR site M-204 were described in detail in by Harvey and others (2000, p. 96-98).

Table 10. Summary of quartz content of selected boreholes in Everglades Nutrient Removal (ENR) project and Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A), north-central Everglades, south Florida

[ft, feet]

Borehole

Depth below land surface (ft)

Quartz content

Minimum (percent)

Maximum (percent)

E1

6.5 to 15

30

40

F1

4.5 to 29

5

40

F4

5 to 26

10

37

M204

4.5 to 20

5

45

South Florida Water Management District staff sorted though the sieved samples for whole and partial fossils to assist in stratigraphic correlation. Fossils were identified and logged. Because of the large number of fossil species identified, each species was assigned a numerical identification number. Preliminary descriptions are provided in Harvey and others (2000). A stratigraphic correlation was not in the scope of this study.

Next: Hydraulic conductivity comparison: other studies >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/02-4050/hycondenrwca.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 13 January, 2005 @ 11:18 AM (KP)