USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > wri > 02-4050 > quantifying recharge/discharge > horizontal gw flow velocities

Interactions Between Surface Water and Ground Water and Effects on Mercury Transport in the North-central Everglades

By Judson W. Harvey, Steven L. Krupa, Cynthia Gefvert, Robert M. Mooney, Jungyill Choi, Susan A. King, and Jefferson B. Giddings

Home
Introduction
Hydrogeology of NC Everglades
Quantifying recharge and discharge
- Approach
- Land-surface topograhy, SW slope, water-level flux
- Horizontal hydraulic gradients
- Horizontal GW flow velocities
- Vertical hydraulic gradients
- Peat hydraulic properties
- Measured vertical head gradients vs hydrogeologic model simulations
- Recharge and discharge estimates
- Water balance
Use of Geochemical Tracers
Effect of GW and SW Interactions
Summary
References
PDF Version

Horizontal Ground-Water Flow Velocities

Horizontal ground-water flow velocities were computed based on hydraulic gradients computed from all of the available well data. Calculations of ground-water flow velocities for both wet and dry conditions are compared in table 13. An average depth-weighted hydraulic conductivity for the Surficial aquifer was used in the calculation (Harvey and others, 2000, p. 175). Results are reported in terms of a solute velocity (Darcy-flow velocity divided by porosity). A porosity of 0.30 was used for all calculations.

Ground-water flow velocities were higher at ENR than WCA-2A by approximately a factor of 6 and 4 in intermediate and deeper layers during the wet season, respectively (table 13). During the dry season, flow rates were approximately an order of magnitude higher in ENR compared with WCA-2A (table 13). If vertical mixing in the Surficial aquifer is ignored (as a first-order assumption), and if all recharge is assumed to occur at the headwater canal adjacent to the levee, the velocities presented in table 13 are consistent with horizontal travel times on the order of hundreds of years beneath ENR and thousands of years beneath WCA-2A. Those estimates of travel time are useful as general indicators of flow, although they are unlikely to accurately reflect the actual ground-water ages because recharge in the wetland interior and vertical mixing are not considered. Although realistic calculations of the ground-water travel time are desirable, those are difficult to compute with confidence at the present time because the spatial distribution of recharge across the wetland and the extent of vertical mixing in the aquifer is still not well enough known.

Next: Vertical hydraulic gradients >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/02-4050/horizgwv.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 13 January, 2005 @ 12:06 PM (KP)