| SUMMARY OF HIGH PRIORITY LANDSCAPE-LEVEL SCIENCE NEEDS
|
| Major DOI Responsibilities and Interests
|
Major Unanswered Questions
|
Needed Science
|
Timeline
|
| Help ensure that hydrologic performance
targets accurately reflect the natural predrainage hydrology and ecology (DOI
CERP partnership responsibility)
|
Landscape-Scale Modeling
|
| What are the physical conditions in the Greater Everglades
prior to drainage and how will the existing conditions respond to water
management?
What is the influence of regional CERP activities (EAA water reservoirs, ASR, barrier walls, etc.) on groundwater recharges to
Everglades National Park, Florida Bay and Biscayne Bay and how do they affect
seepage into the surficial aquifer?
What monitoring programs and
research projects need to be implemented that will provide appropriate data
for verification and calibration of existing models?
|
Develop tools to describe the hydrology in the predrainage
ecosystem.
A groundwater model is needed to address historical,
current and projected groundwater flows between Everglades and Biscayne and
Florida Bays
Model and monitoring of the surficial aquifer
Collection and synthesis of model calibration and
verification data
Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses
Continuous calibration, validation, testing, and peer
review
Improved accessibility of modeling data and analysis
results through the development of decision support tools and graphical user
interfaces
Improved accessibility of model code and associated
metadata
|
The
landscape-level science needs relate to multiple projects with multiple
timelines.
|
| Comprehensive Integrated
Water Quality Feasibility Study
|
| What were the water quality parameters in the pre-drainage
Everglades?
|
Research to determine the natural water quality parameters
for the estuaries.
|
|
|
|
|
| Help ensure that hydrologic performance
targets protect threatened and endangered species and promote fish, wildlife,
and park values (consultations on project design related to DOI stewardship
responsibilities)
|
Landscape-Scale Modeling
|
|
| What simulation models need to be developed that will
predict the ecological response of key indicator species and landscape level
communities to proposed changes in water management?
What decision support tools, including graphical user
interfaces, need to be developed so that model output can be easily
interpreted for assessment purposes?
What are the ways to increase sustainable compatibility of
the built environment with natural system needs of national parks and refuges
̵ especially, relevant to water-related challenges?
Can linking together existing
models of the ecological response of individual species provide insight into
the predictive response of multiple species to changes in water management or
do additional models need to be developed?
Which hydrologic models are available to cover coastal
areas where the SFWMM is less accurate, and how might the input into those
models be improved?
How can ecological performance measures be incorporated
into decision support tools that have reasonably simple output formats?
What alternative higher resolution hydrologic models are
available to drive the ecological models?
What improvements can be made to existing hydrologic
models or what new models need to be developed to improve predictive measures
of salinity?
How can existing model output be converted
into other formats to allow data to be analyzed using different platforms and
exported for use in GIS?
|
Modeling of vegetative production and changes in
vegetative communities:
- tree islands
- mangrove vegetation
- sawgrass prairie
- vegetative communities important for endangered
species, such as muhly grass
- invasive or exotic species that are recognized to be
in competition with the communities listed above
Landscape-scale land use
compatibility assessment tools
Everglades Landscape Model (ELM)
development
Regional Simulation Model (RSM) ecological module
development
Development and validation of spatially explicit habitat
suitability index models:
- threatened and endangered species
- indicator species sensitive to hydrologic change
- certain established or potential exotic species
Development and validation of stage-structured demographic
models:
- threatened and endangered species
- indicator species sensitive to hydrologic change
- freshwater fish functional group
- estuarine fish functional group
Development and validation of individual-based demographic
models:
- threatened and endangered species
- key prey species (white-tailed deer)
- certain wading bird species
Development and validation of higher resolution ecological
models
Incorporation of models into the monitoring and adaptive
assessment program
Models that describe and link water management
and hydrodynamics with habitat impacts, particularly related to marine and
estuarine environments (ie. Submerged aquatics).
|
|
Comprehensive Integrated Water Quality Feasibility
Study
|
| |
Research to link WQ characteristics, such as performance
targets, to ecosystem structure and function
Phosphorus-reduction technologies
Research to identify relevant links between water quality
and ecosystem structure and function
Research to identify degraded ecosystems and quantify the
types and sources of pollution
Better understanding of the water quality impact of ASR
activities on the natural system
|
|
Studies to Support Fish and Wildlife Friendly Siting
and Operation of Reservoirs, STAs, and ASR Structures
|
| What construction and operational
considerations can minimize adverse effects of water projects on fish and
wildlife values?
|
GIS habitat mapping to guide site selection for large
reservoirs and STAs
Studies of the effects of intake pumps and control
structures
Analyses of reservoirs
and STAs as habitats for invasive exotic aquatic species
|
| Risks to Fish and Wildlife
from Soil-Borne Contaminants
|
| How can we improve upon standard environmental assessment
protocols to better characterize background contaminant levels on large
parcels of land?
What trust resources are at greatest risk from exposure to
soil and sediment contaminants, and what is the risk of bioaccumulative
contaminants?
What is the relative risk of exposure to multiple
contaminants compared to the risk of exposure to an individual contaminant?
How will rehydration affect risk from methyl mercury
exposure or bioaccumulation?
|
Site contamination assessments
Risk assessments
- Risks associated with bioaccumulation
- Risks associated with multiple contaminants
Sediment quality assessment guidelines for mercury and
selenium
Research into the potential effects of copper on
periphyton
Monitoring of actual uptake of contaminants into the food
chain
Research to determine direct and indirect (food web)
effects of mosquito control chemicals on federally listed species
|
|
|
|
|
| Assess the responses of ecological communities
and species as a basis for adaptive management (continuation of DOI
responsibilities outlined above)
|
Landscape-Scale Monitoring
and Assessment
|
|
| What monitoring and assessment programs need to be put in
place to provide information for interim goals and target assessments and
CERP Updates?
Which portions of the MAP should DOI fund to best support
restoration of DOI resources (e.g. DOI lands and threatened and endangered
species) and to ensure a sound science base for adaptive management?
How can DOI ensure that the monitoring and research
components proposed in the MAP contribute to recovery goals for the species
and ecosystems of South Florida?
How can data management systems allow for
management decision-making and improved accessibility to; synthesis of
information; synthesis of monitoring and assessment; and restoration
evaluation data and analysis information.
How will coastal communities be affected by the
simultaneous effects of increased freshwater flows and sea-level rise?
|
Interim goals and targets development and assessment
Additional tool development and research for Interim Goal
predictions and desired restoration conditions
Peer review and assessment methodology, analysis and data
management
MAP implementation
Development of decision support tools to allow
for better access to and analysis of monitoring data and evaluation
assessment reports
Development and implementation of long term
storage of data, metadata, and analysis information
Enhance hydrologic and meteorological
monitoring networks
Develop accessible and shared
databases.
Research to assess the current and historic
interrelationships between sea level to support the development and
validation of process-based models.
Long-term monitoring of coastal community
resources to detect early ecological responses to changes in sea-level.
|