USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > paper > the use of historical charts and photographs in ecosystem restoration: examples from the Everglades Historical Air Photo Project > data accuracy

16. The use of historical charts and photographs in ecosystem restoration: examples from the Everglades Historical Air Photo Project

Data accuracy

Introduction
Methods
>Data accuracy
Example applications
Conclusions
Acknowledgements & Websites
Bibliography
Figures
PDF Version

The best way to estimate accuracy is to compare the mapped and scanned information with independently collected data of higher accuracy. Two types of accuracy are important: thematic and spatial. Thematic accuracy refers to feature identification and labeling during the mapping or digital encoding process. In the case of historical map data, independent sources of highly accurate thematic information can be difficult to acquire or non-existent. This is the case with the T-sheets. And since the T-sheets are simply being encoded as images for subsequent visual interpretation (i.e., no additional attribution is being assigned to boundaries or shades in the scanned images) no additional thematic error is introduced through the digitizing process. Therefore, an assessment of their thematic accuracy will not be described here.

Spatial accuracy refers to the amount of error associated with location positioning. Sources of spatial error include the following:

1) boundary line placement during aerial photographic visual interpretation;
2) photogrammetric processing of source airborne imagery;
3) expansion/contraction of paper map products;
4) scanner induced distortions;
5) imprecise determination of row / column locations for map identifiable points on the T-Sheets during rubber sheeting;
6) imprecise determination of corresponding map or orthorectified image points during rubber sheeting.
In the case of the T-sheets, error produced by any of items 1-4 above cannot be specifically identified. In practice, utmost care must be taken in the selection and correction of control points (items 5 and 6) to minimize the introduction of additional error. Assessment of T-sheet control-point selection is made during the rubber-sheeting process. An evaluation of overall spatial accuracy (that is, items (1-6) is possible when some features that are known not to have significantly changed can be located in the scanned historic maps and other current geospatial data such as high-resolution digital orthophotographs (USGS 2002). In later figures in this chapter, examples of lines from a T-Sheet superimposed on a high-resolution digital orthophotograph are given.

< Methods | Example applications >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/hischartsphotos/data.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 22 February, 2011 @ 04:42 PM(KP)