USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > paper > ground water recharge and discharge in the central everglades > study sites

Ground Water Recharge and Discharge in the Central Everglades

Study Sites

Abstract
Introduction
>Study Sites
Methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgments
References
PDF version
The surficial aquifer is a principal source of fresh drinking water in south Florida. It is composed mainly of shallow water marine facies, including coral limestones, beach and offshore sandbar complexes, lagoonal limestones, and an oolitic ridge along the coast of Miami (Perkins 1977). The surficial aquifer includes the highly transmissive Biscayne Aquifer, which underlies Miami- Dade County, Broward County, and eastern Palm Beach County. The Biscayne Aquifer is thickest beneath the Atlantic coastal ridge to the east of the Everglades, and it thins from east to west, disappearing beneath the north-central Everglades. Aquifers to the west of the Biscayne and beneath the Everglades generally have been ignored as potential sources of ground water, both because of the lower transmissivities (Fish 1988) and because of the higher total dissolved solids in ground water beneath the Everglades (Howie 1987).

Beyond these few studies cited here, there is relatively little comprehensive information available about the hydrogeology beneath the central Everglades in western Palm Beach and Broward counties. Miller (1988) illustrated some of the effects that water management has had on ground water levels in that part of the central Everglades. Recent work characterized the geology and hydraulic properties of the surficial aquifer beneath the northern WCAs in greater detail than previously available (Harvey et al. 2002). The present study extended that work through collection of additional hydraulic conductivity data from shallow layers (1a and 1b, Table 1). Table 1 combines and summarizes basic hydrogeologic information collected beneath WCA-2A, which is representative of much of the central Everglades.

Table 1
Hydrolithogeological Properties of Surficial Aquifer, WCA-2A Central Everglades
Average Thickness
(m)
Primary Lithology
Common Formation Name
Geologic Timescale
Hydraulic Conductivity
K (cm/day)
1 Peat Undifferentiated deposits Holocene 60
1 Fresh water marl/sand Undifferentiated deposits Holocene 50
4.5 Sand Fort Thompson Pleistocene 2500
4 Limestone with sand stringers Fort Thompson Pleistocene 9000
7.5 Sand Fort Thompson Pleistocene 5000
9 Sand with fine sand layers Tamiami Pliocene 4000
Modified from Harvey et al. 2002 and Harvey et al. 2000

Everglades Nutrient Removal Project

The ENR Project was constructed and operated in the 1990s as a prototype to test the capacity of larger constructed wetlands, called storm water treatment areas, to remove nutrients from agricultural drainage waters (Figures 1 and 3a). ENR is comprised of a 1545 ha area that was formerly part of the Everglades, but was drained and farmed beginning in the mid-1900s, and then recently returned to management as a constructed wetland. The source of surface water to ENR is pumpage from agricultural land to the west and from surface water from Lake Okeechobee. ENR's location in the Everglades landscape affects interactions between surface water and ground water. To the east of ENR is WCA-1, where water surface elevations are maintained at relatively high elevations compared with the rest of the Everglades. To the west of the ENR is the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA ), where subsidence and canal drainage have substantially decreased the ground elevation and water table relative to WCA-1 and ENR. Proximity to the agricultural area has a significant effect on the ENR water budget, with recharge in ENR accounting for flow equal to 30% of the pumped inflow of surface water (Choi and Harvey 2000).

Water Conservation Area 2A

Located 10 km to the south of ENR, WCA-2A is 25 times larger in area (42,525 ha) than ENR (Figure 3b). Studying WCA-2A is a logical complement to investigations in ENR, because of the much larger area and much longer history of nutrient pollution (Urban et al. 1993; Jensen et al. 1995). WCA-2A shares boundaries with WCA-1 and the EAA , lands developed for light industrial and residential areas to the east, and WCA-3A to the southwest. In the 1950s, construction began on a new system of levees and borrow canals to connect the canal and levee systems that bordered WCA-2A to the north and south (Light and Dineen 1994). By about 1963, WCA-2A was completely surrounded by levees and canals (Figure 3B).

Researchers started investigating the ecology of WCA-2A beginning about 1975, documenting, for example, the loss of tree islands and a transition from a sawgrassdominated wetland to one affected by extensive cattail growth in some areas (Jensen et al. 1995). Possible causes for those ecological changes are excess nutrients from agricultural runoff, and excessive periods of drying and wetting due to water-management practices.

illustrations showing research sites, instrumentation, and natural and manmade features in the study sites, central Everglades, south Florida
Figure 3. Research sites, instrumentation, and natural and manmade features in (a) ENR Project and (b) WCA-2, central Everglades, south Florida. [larger version]

< Go back to Introduction | Go ahead to Methods >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/gw_discharge/studysites.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 12 January, 2005 @ 10:12 AM(KP)