USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > paper > the impact of anthropogenic land-cover change on the florida peninsula sea breezes and warm season sensible weather > model configuration and methodology > land-use data


2. Model configuration and methodology

Home
Introduction
Model Configuration & Methodology
> Land-use Data
- RAMS Model
- Experimental Design
Results
Sensitivity Tests
Comparison: Model & Observed Trends
Conclusion
References
Figures
PDF version

a. Land-use data

map showing grid configurations
Fig. 2. Grid configurations for the RAMS domain used in this study. [larger image]
Land-cover datasets representing pre-1900 natural cover and 1993 land use were developed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in support of this study. Figure 1 shows the dominant classes for each dataset. These data, which incorporate several improvements relative to the datasets used by Pielke et al. (1999), were constructed for use in the RAMS land surface parameterization, Land Ecosystem-Atmosphere Feedback 2 (LEAF-2; Walko et al. 2000). The data domains, covering the southeastern United States at 1-km grid spacing and most of Florida at 100 m, were designed to span the RAMS model outer and inner grid domains shown in Fig. 2 (the RAMS grid configuration is described in section 2b). Use of these datasets required the number of existing LEAF-2 classes (and related biophysical parameters) to be expanded to include sloughs, saw grass marshes, wet prairies, saltwater marshes, mangroves, and various mixed woody wetland complexes. Water depths and hydroperiods for freshwater marshes were categorized according to Kushlan (1990). The hydroperiod was defined as that time of year during which the surface is inundated with standing water. A seasonally dependent water depth was determined by the type of wetland complex. All other landcover classes in the datasets were defined in terms of the existing LEAF-2 categories. With the addition of the classes shown in Fig. 1 to those already existing in LEAF-2, 40 categories were available for use in the simulations presented in this paper.

A Geographic Information System (GIS) was employed by the USGS to combine a variety of data sources to develop the updated land-cover datasets. Early vegetation maps, historical analyses, and paleodata studies were the primary inputs for the pre-1900 dataset. The reconstructed natural vegetation for the Everglades (south of the Kissimmee River watershed) was derived mainly from a GIS analysis of the Davis (1943) South Florida Natural Vegetation Map, as adapted by McVoy (1996), McVoy et al. (2003), and Willard et al. (2001). McVoy (1996) analyzed historical documents and early photographs to reconstruct the distribution of saw grass and slough/bogs/marshes in the Everglades prior to conversion to agriculture and the diversion of surface water flow by the construction of surface hydrology controls [a historical review of water resource engineering activities is provided by Light and Dineen (1994)]. Subsequently, Willard et al. (2001) presented evidence based on paleostudies of pollen data extracted from core samples within the Everglades to support the analysis of McVoy. Given these historical and paleovegetation studies, the pre-1900 land-cover dataset is believed to closely approximate the vegetation patterns that existed in the Everglades prior to large-scale human disturbance activities. The predisturbance land-cover data constructed by Costanza (1975, 1979) was used for the Kissimmee River watershed. The Kuchler (1964) potential natural vegetation dataset was used as the primary source of pre-1900 data for the remainder of Florida and the southeastern United States, with two modifications. First, the southern mixed forest class was modified to a predominantly evergreen needle leaf forest, which represents the extensive areas of longleaf pine and Florida slash pine in fire-prone areas (Landers and Boyer 1999). Second, the data were modified to account for the freshwater marsh areas of the southern St. Johns River basin (note the axis of marsh over the east-central peninsula shown in Fig. 1, just inland of Cape Kennedy, southward to the latitude of the north shore of Lake Okeechobee).

The 1993 land-cover datasets were derived from the USGS 30-m National Land Cover Data dataset (NLCD; Vogelmann et al. 1998, 2001) and the 30-m Florida Gap Analysis Project (GAP) dataset (Pearlstine et al. 2002). The USGS NLCD, which was developed for the conterminous United States based on 1992-93 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data, was used for the RAMS outer grid within the southeastern United States. The 1993 land-cover data for the model inner grid was derived by combining the NLCD for Florida with the GAP data. The GAP land-cover product was developed by the USGS (Biological Resources Discipline), the Florida State Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and the University of Florida using Landsat TM scenes from the 1992-94 time frame. Urban, residential, mixed agriculture, and other standard classes were selected from the NLCD, while wetlands, forests, and dry prairies were selected from the GAP data.


Go back to Introduction | Go ahead to RAMS Model Configuration



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/cover_weather/model.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 15 January, 2013 @ 12:43 PM(TJE)