USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > open file report > OFR 98-205 > introduction

Abstract
Introduction
Material & Methods
Lithostratigraphy
Petrography, Biostratigraphy &
Sr-isotope Analysis
Conclusions
References
Figures
Tables
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
PDF version

Introduction

Collier County in southern Florida (fig. 1) includes the southwestern part of the Kissimmee River-Lake Okeechobee-Everglades wetland ecosystem. The construction of canals, levees, and cross-peninsula highways has created obstructions to natural sheet flow of surface water to the southwestern coast and allowed salt water to penetrate inland. Recent public concern over changes in the southern Florida ecosystem has mandated local, state, and federal agencies, as well as private businesses, to halt some of their practices and to begin the long process of restoration of the ecosystem toward its pre-development state. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Florida Geological Survey (FGS) have joined with the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Park Service, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and other state and local agencies to examine the hydrology and ecology in southwestern Florida and to begin to understand their system dynamics.
map of Collier and Monroe Counties showing locations of the corehole sites and cross-section lines
Figure 1. Map of Collier and Monroe Counties, southwestern Florida (inset) showing locations of the corehole sites, numbered and identified on the figure, and the lines of cross-sections, A-B, B-C, and A-C, shown in Figures 10, 11, and 12. [larger image]

In 1996, seven cores were recovered in western Collier County, in the area between Alligator Alley (I-75), Tamiami Trail (U.S. Route 41), State Route 29, and State Route 951, as part of a joint USGS and FGS project (fig. 1). The objective is to acquire subsurface geologic and hydrologic data in southwestern Florida to support ground-water modeling in that region, thereby expanding the utility of these models for land and water management. The lithology and geophysics of these cores were summarized by Weedman and others (1997). This report describes the lithostratigraphy, X-ray diffraction analyses, petrography, biostratigraphy, and strontium (Sr) isotope stratigraphy of the same cores.

Previous geologic and hydrologic studies were discussed by Weedman and others (1997). The current model for the surficial aquifer system of southwestern Florida consists of two aquifers: the water-table and the lower Tamiami aquifers, separated by a semi-confining unit (Southeastern Geological Society, 1986; Bennett, 1992). An additional aquifer has been identified within the surficial system in south-central and southeastern Florida. The gray limestone aquifer, described from Dade County by Fish and Stewart (1991), is assumed to extend westward into Collier and perhaps Monroe counties, and may be correlative with the lower Tamiami aquifer. In this study we have identified the Tamiami Formation and we recognize an unnamed formation below the Tamiami Formation. Some of the unnamed formation is possibly correlative with a newly described and proposed formation recognized in the Florida Keys to the south, the proposed Long Key Formation (Cunningham and others, 1998). The Tamiami Formation is the primary stratigraphic unit comprising the water table aquifer, and perhaps some of the lower Tamiami aquifer, in southwestern Florida. The Hawthorn Group and its constituents, the Peace River and Arcadia Formations, were not recognized in any of the cores discussed here, although the unnamed formation may be correlative in part.

Acknowledgments

We thank drillers Jim Trindell (FGS), Don Queen (USGS), Alex Howell (FGS), Frank Rush (FGS), and Roger van Landingham (FGS). We also extend our thanks to Bob Henry from Collier-Seminole State Park, Mike Owen, Jolen Mabry, Jim Nelson, and the late Eddy Lowery from Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Erv Crosby and Sonja Durrwachter of the Florida State Division of Forestry, Mel Fisher and Mike Quigley of the Southern States Utilities Company, Gary Susdorf of Viro Group, Inc., and Kevin Rohrer of SFWMD in West Palm Beach, Florida. Processing for dinocysts was done by Tom Sheehan and Lisa Weimer; Tom Sheehan also assisted in the collection of samples and Lisa Weimer performed preliminary examination of samples. Mollusk samples were collected with the assistance of Harley Means and Tom Sheehan. Mollusk sample preparation was by Steve Wandrei and Jill D'Ambrosio. Sample preparation for foraminifers was performed by Ian Graham and Kevin McKinney. We wish to thank John Jackson (USGS) for sharing his expertise on the use of the Diano X-ray diffraction spectrometer, calibration, and interpretation of results. We thank Frank Dulong (USGS) for his guidance in sample preparation and the interpretation of X-ray diffraction results. Bruce Wardlaw and Rob Weems provided valuable comments on the manuscript.

< Go back to Abstract | Go ahead to Material & Methods >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/98-205/intro.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 14 March, 2005 @ 11:28 AM(TJE)