USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Greater Everglades Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > open file report > Ecosystem History of Southern and Central Biscayne Bay > introduction


Ecosystem History of Southern and Central Biscayne Bay: Summary Report on Sediment Core Analyses - Year Two

U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2004-1312

INTRODUCTION

Abstract
Introduction
Acknowledgments
Materials and Methods
Addl. Analyses of Mudbank Cores
Patterns of Change:Military Canal
Patterns of Change: Near-shore Sites
Summary
Implications for Restoration
References
Appendixes
Tables and Figures
PDF
Biscayne Bay is a large (428 square miles) subtropical estuarine ecosystem (Figure 1) that began forming approximately 3200 years ago as sea level rose and flooded southern Florida (Wanless and others, 1994).  Throughout most of its history the pristine waters of the bay supported a rich and diverse marine fauna and flora and the bay waters served as a nursery for the adjacent coral reef ecosystem.  In the 20th century, urbanization of the Miami-Dade area profoundly affected the environment of the bay.  Construction of power plants, water treatment plants, solid waste sites, and large scale development along the shoreline stressed the ecosystem.  Demands of the population for reliable freshwater supply and flood control led to the construction of extensive canal systems throughout south Florida, most notably the Central and Southern Florida Project.

The current massive effort to restore south Florida, guided by the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP), lists restoration of the timing, quantity and quality of the natural flow of freshwater as one its primary goals.  Before restoration can occur, however, the baseline conditions of the environment prior to significant human alteration must be established and the range of variation within the natural system must be determined.  This information can then be used by resource managers to establish targets and performance measures for restoration.

satellite image map of Biscayne Bay, Florida, showing sites where USGS cores were collected (Chicken Key, No Name, Featherbed, Black Point North, Military Canal, Card Bank, Middle Key, and Manatee Bay)
Figure 1. Satellite image map of Biscayne Bay, Florida, showing sites where USGS cores were collected and the boundary of Biscayne National Park (blue dashed line). Image cropped from John W. Jones and others (2001) . [larger image]
The objectives of the U.S. Geological Survey's Ecosystem History of Biscayne Bay research project are to examine historical changes in the Biscayne Bay ecosystem at selected sites on a decadal-centennial scale, and to correlate these changes with natural events and anthropogenic alterations in the South Florida region.  Specific emphasis is being placed on historical changes to (1) amount, timing, and sources of freshwater influx and the resulting effects on salinity and water quality; (2) shoreline and sub-aquatic vegetation; and (3) the relationship between sea-level change, onshore vegetation, and salinity.

The information generated by this research addresses the needs of the many entities involved in managing Biscayne Bay, primarily Biscayne National Park and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)SFWMD's Water Management Plan for south Florida includes the establishment of minimum flows and water levels for different bodies of water within the District, including Biscayne Bay (with an emphasis on central and southern Biscayne Bay) (www.sfwmd.gov/org/wsd/mfl/biscaynebay).  The purpose of the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands Project (BBCW) of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) is "to rehydrate wetlands and reduce point source discharge to Biscayne Bay" (http://www.evergladesplan.org/pm/projects/proj_28_biscayne_bay.cfm) and the project identifies the need to "define target freshwater flows for Biscayne Bay and the wetlands."  Biscayne National Park, like all National Parks, was charged by the Organic Act of 1916 with “conserving the scenery and the natural and historic objects, and the wildlife therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”  One of the Park’s management goals is to understand how the conditions of the resources have changed over time.  Our research provides these agencies with long-term spatial and temporal data on changes to the ecosystem that allow them to establish minimum flow values, targets, and performance measures based on centuries of data and to understand how to conserve and protect the resource.

In order to achieve our project objectives, we have examined a total of eleven cores, six collected specifically for the current project.  This report is divided into three sections to discuss three different categories of cores:  (1) mudbank cores; (2) wetland cores; and (3) near-shore cores.  Three of the eleven cores were collected from mudbanks in central and southern Biscayne Bay in 2002, and the bulk of these analyses were discussed in Wingard and others (2003); however, some additional analyses completed since the publication of that report are described here in the "Additional Analyses of Mudbank Cores" section.  Two wetland cores were collected in order to examine changes to the wetland ecosystems bordering the bay; these are discussed in section entitled "Patterns of Change in the Wetlands at Military Canal."  In order to determine more accurately the role of freshwater influx on the patterns seen in the mudbank cores, three additional cores were collected in 2003 at sites located in near-shore areas in close proximity to historical freshwater drainage; the preliminary results of these analyses are reported in the "Patterns of Change at Near-shore Sites" section.

The multiproxy, multicore approach utilized in this study has been successfully used in Florida Bay (Brewster-Wingard and others, 1998; Brewster-Wingard and Ishman, 1999; Nelsen and others, 2002; Wardlaw, 2001) and will be utilized to address issues in other areas of south Florida in the future.  By understanding the past - the natural range of variation within an ecosystem - we can set realistic goals for restoration, and through the past we can potentially understand the future and how the system will respond to restoration efforts. 



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/ofr/2004-1312/introduction.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 15 January, 2013 @ 12:43 PM(HSH)