USGS - science for a changing world

South Florida Information Access (SOFIA)


publications > fact sheet > FS 2004-3015

U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
FS 2004-3015

Development of a Long-term Sampling Network to Monitor Restoration Success in the Southwest Coastal Everglades: Vegetation, Hydrology, and Sediments

Introduction and History

photo of a mangrove forest post Hurricane Andrew
Figure 1. What is left of a mangrove forest that was crossed by the eye wall of Hurricane Andrew. The photo was taken in Biscayne National Park in September 1992, three weeks after the storm. [larger image]
Hurricane Andrew, a Category 5 storm, crossed the southern Florida peninsula on the morning of August 24, 1992 (Fig. 1). Following the storm, the National Park Service conducted an environmental damage assessment to gauge the storm's impacts on the natural resources of south Florida Park Service holdings (Pimm et al., 1994). Although hurricanes have impacted Park Service lands such as the Everglades in the past (Houston and Powell, 2003), no systematic, permanent sampling scheme has been established to monitor long-term recovery (or lack thereof) following disturbance.

In October 1992, vegetation monitoring plots were established in heavily damaged areas of mangrove forest on the southwest coast of the Everlgades, along the Lostmans and Broad Rivers (Smith et al., 1994, see Fig. 2). As the permanent plot network was being established, funding was awarded for the South Florida Global Climate Change project (SOFL-GCC). This led to the establishment of a network of hydrological monitoring stations (Anderson and Smith, 2004). Finally, sediment elevation tables (SETs) were installed at many locations. SETs provide the means to measure very small changes (2 mm) in the sediment surface elevation accurately over time (Cahoon et al., 2002). We also set up marker horizons to measure accretion of sediment at each site (Smith and Cahoon, 2003). Sampling sites were located along three transects extending from upstream freshwater wetlands to downstream saltwater wetlands along the Shark, Lostmans and Chatham Rivers in Everglades National Park (Fig. 2).

map showing location of sampling sites in Everglades National Park
Figure 2. Location of sampling sites in Everglades National Park. RED dots = surface and groundwater stage and conductivity; YELLOW dots = surface and groundwater stage and conductivity, permanent vegetation plots, and sediment elevation sampling; light GREEN dots = sediment porewater piezometers and permanent vegetation plots; light BLUE dots = permanent vegetation plots; large TAN dot = location of the mangrove marsh ecotone boardwalk, with surface and groundwater wells, sediment porewater piezometers, and permanent vegetation plots. [larger image]
While we were developing our sampling network for basic scientific research needs, concern mounted over the health of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem and in particular over the influence of decreased freshwater flows (Smith et al., 1989). Ecosystem restoration planning was begun, resulting in the multi-agency, $8 billion Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). Our co-located sampling networks Fig. 3) allow us to track the interaction of hydrology, sediment, and vegetation over time, and will provide the opportunity to monitor the progress of the Everglades restoration and to gauge its success. Our earlier research questions have been modified over time to place a major emphasis on CERP needs, while still recognizing the importance of other processes, including disturbance and sea-level rise.

Our research addresses processes relevant to the following restoration and related questions:

  • How will increasing freshwater flow affect wetland primary production?
  • Will increasing freshwater inflow alter nutrient availability?
  • Does recovery following disturbance in mangroves depend on freshwater inflow?
  • Will the position of vegetation ecotones change in response to upstream water management?
  • What will be the influence of global climate change, such as sea-level rise, on the Everglades restoration?
  • Will processes of wetlands soil formation be altered by sea-level rise and changed freshwater inflow?

Figure 3. Oblique aerial photograph of a representative study site layout with vegetation plots, hydrology station, and sediment elevation tables (SETs). The greenish color is mangrove forest and the grayish color is black needle-rush marsh. Estuarine fauna is also sampled at this site. [larger image] oblique aerial photograph of a representative study site layout with vegetation plots, hydrology station, and sediment elevation tables

Illustrative Results

diagrams illustrating results from three surveys at the Lostmans Ranger Station plot
Figure 4. Results from three surveys at the Lostmans Ranger Station plot are shown. The X and Y axes are arbitrary, with 0,0 representing the center of the 10m radius plot. The vertical axis shows stem diameter at breast height, in cm. The top figure depicts the plot as it appeared prior to Hurricane Andrew (based on a "reconstruction" from the initial sampling in October 1992). The middle panel shows the situation in January 1995. Recruitment is well underway and consists of an even mix of Rhizophora and Laguncularia. The bottom figure shows the status in October 2002, 10 years after the hurricane. Rhizophora now dominates the pool of recruits. [larger image]
The trajectory of vegetation change, growth, mortality, and recruitment has been highly variable among plots. Indeed, most plots have followed unique patterns. The only overall pattern was the increase in stem density observed in all plots (Fig. 4). The species that dominated recruitment varied, sometimes being Rhizophora mangle (red mangrove), often Laguncularia racemosa (white mangrove), but never Avicennia germinans (black mangrove). The rate of stem-density increase has varied among plots by over two orders of magnitude. Individuals are continuing to recruit into the population at many sites.

Mortality is occurring at all sites. Sources of tree mortality include continuing demise from damage initially caused by Hurricane Andrew, trees being killed by falling debris, lightning, wind-throw during winter cold fronts, freeze, fire, and several less intense tropical cyclones since Andrew such as Hurricanes Georges, Harvey, Irene, and Mitch. Trees in the smaller-size classes are beginning to perish due to suppression (that is, being overtopped and heavily shaded by larger neighbors, see Fig. 4).

Observed patterns of growth by trees that survived Andrew or that recruited into the plots are hard to explain. Productivity cannot be explained simply by sediment-porewater nutrient concentrations, which are highly variable. Salinity and hydrologic parameters seem most promising to explain patterns of biomass increase following the catastrophic disturbance from Hurricane Andrew.

In addition to influencing mangrove forest structure, the severe disturbance from Hurricane Andrew has affected the stability and elevation of the sediment surface. In the lower Lostmans River, an area highly impacted by the storm, sediment elevation has been decreasing for at least five years (Fig. 5). The forests at the mouth of the Shark River, an area not impacted by Hurricane Andrew, are remaining at constant elevation (Fig. 5). Visual inspection of the data indicates that surface-water dynamics do not seem to be related to sediment-elevation changes.

Sampling of these vegetation plots, hydrology stations, and sediment elevation tables will continue in order to monitor the effect of increasing freshwater inflow that will occur as a major component of the Everglades restoration. We will also use the data currently available to develop performance measures that can be used by CERP.

Mouth of the Shark River Mouth of the Lostmans River
graph showing surface-water hydrology and sediment-elevation dynamics at the Shark River-mouth location in Everglades National Park graph showing surface-water hydrology and sediment-elevation dynamics at the Lostmans River-mouth location in Everglades National Park
Figure 5. Surface-water hydrology (red) and sediment-elevation dynamics at two river-mouth locations in Everglades National Park. The black lines show sediment surface elevation over time (solid with error bars, ± 1 SE) and the linear trend in elevation (dashed). The green lines show sediment elevation minus accretion (solid with error bars) and the linear trend (dashed). [click on images above for larger image]

Literature Cited

Anderson, G.H., and Smith, T.J., III, 2004, Data from the mangrove hydrology sampling network for the Lower Shark River, Everglades National Park: Water years 1995 - 2002. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-457.

Cahoon, D.R., Lynch, J.C., Hensel, P., Boumans, R., Perez, B.C., Segura, B., and Day, J.W. Jr., 2002, A device for high precision measurement of wetland sediment elevation; I. Recent improvements to the sedimentation-erosion-table. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 72 (5): p. 730-733.

Houston, S.H., and Powell M.D., 2003, Surface wind fields for Florida Bay hurricanes. Journal of Coastal Research, 19: p. 503-513.

Pimm, S., Davis, G., Loope, L., Roman, C., Smith, T.J. III, and Tilmant J., 1994, Hurricane Andrew. BioScience, 44: p. 224-229.

Smith, T.J., III, and Cahoon D.R., 2003, Wetland sediment surface elevation in the Florida Everglades: response to surface water stage variation. Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Coastal Engineering and Science of Coastal Sediment Processes. East Meets West Productions, Corpus Cristi, TX. CD-ROM.

Smith, T.J., III, Hudson, J.H., Robblee, M.B., Powell, G.V.N., and Isdale, P.J., 1989, Freshwater flow from the Everglades to Florida Bay: A historical reconstruction based on fluorescent banding in the coral Solenastrea bournoni. Bulletin of Marine Science, 44: p. 274-282.

Smith, T.J., III, Robblee, M.B., Wanless, H.R., and Doyle T.W., 1994, Mangroves, hurricanes and lightning strikes. BioScience, 44: p. 256-262.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work was provided by the USGS-BRD Global Climate Change Program, the USGS Priority Ecosystems Studies Program, and the Critical Ecosystems Studies Initiative administered by Everglades National Park.

For more Information Contact:
Thomas J. Smith III.
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South, St. Petersburg, FL. 33701
Phone: 727-803-8747 x 3130 Fax: 727-803-2030
Email: Tom_J_Smith@usgs.gov

Download a PDF version of this factsheet (1.3 MB). Please note: you will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to view this file.



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/fs/2004-3015/index.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 04 September, 2013 @ 02:03 PM (KP)