USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
projects > influence of hydrology on life-history of common freshwater fishes from southern florida > abstract


The Effects of Hydroperiod on Life-History Parameters of two Species of Livebearing Fish (Poeciliidae) in the Florida Everglades

By Timothy Konnert1, Joel C. Trexler1, and William F. Loftus2

1Florida International University, Miami, FL., USA
2U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Water and Restoration Studies, Homestead, FL., USA

photo of a sailfin molly
[larger image]
photo of a least killifish
[larger image]
Figure 1. Top: sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna); bottom: least killifish (Heterandria formosa).

Ecologists often make assumptions about the “stressfulness” of habitats based on fluctuation in the physical environment and its presumed effects on organismal vital rates such as age-specific survivorship or fertility. In aquatic habitats, fluctuations in water level leading to dry-down events are often considered “stressful” for fishes because it is assumed that reduced habitat area and crowding have adverse effects on survivorship and fertility. However, the degree of drying, as demonstrated by variations in minimum surface-water depths, is rarely constant among years in the Everglades. That variation may produce dramatically different effects on the fish community, depending on factors such as availability and quality of refuges that remain wetted. Furthermore, organisms typically have physiological and behavioral adaptations to compensate for environmental variability, including synchronization of reproductive and migratory patterns with environmental fluctuation, and phenotypic plasticity. Consequently, the matching of recurrent “stress” with measures of survivorship and reproduction are critical to produce predictive demographic models. While comparative statements about the relative stressfulness of habitats are common in the literature on life histories, we question the ability to make such comparisons without age-specific survival and fertility data. To improve the utility of management models such as ATLSS, we sought to estimate explicitly the effects of hydroperiod on demographic rates of two of the most common species in the Everglades, the sailfin molly and the least killifish (Poeciliidae) (fig. 1).
map showing six study sites
Figure 2. Map showing six study sites. [larger image]

We used estimates of age-length relation to estimate age-specific survival and fertility for sailfin mollies and least killifish from six sites in the Everglades that experience a gradient of hydrological conditions (fig. 2). These six sites are the focus of long-term monitoring of fish communities, and we used samples collected from 1997 to 1999 to estimate age-specific survivorship curves and fertility schedules. From those data, we constructed life tables to compare patterns in vital rates of each species with hydroperiod. Also, we compared the idealized estimate of population growth rate from the life table to real population dynamics over the same time period. Otoliths were used (fig. 3) to determine the relation between size and age for male, female, and juvenile sailfin mollies from the six study sites (fig. 4).

Calibrations indicated that this method was very accurate for juvenile fish, but tended to under-estimate age in older, mature specimens. We also dissected female fish from the long-term field collections to estimate size-specific fertility for females of each species. We used the otolith data to estimate the age of females based on size in order to transform these data into age-specific fertility tables for each study site.
The analyses indicated that growth rate and age-specific fertility differed among locations, and that some patterns could be explained by hydroperiod. However, many of the patterns were not consistent with the expectation that short-hydroperiod sites are more stressful for these two species.

photo of a cross-section of a sailfin molly otolith

Figure 3. Cross-section of a sailfin molly otolith. The number of rings indicates the fish’s age in days. [larger image]
For example, the longest life expectation and highest lifetime fertility were noted at the short hydroperiod sites for both taxa. These results yielded greater estimates of population growth rate [r] for the two short-hydroperiod sites. Either both species have adaptations that permit them to circumvent the conditions that make these sites appear stressful to ecologists, or immigration is subsidizing populations in shorthydroperiod sites yielding a more favorable demographic profile than is actually realized by residents of the site. Ongoing research on dispersal by similar species before and after droughts suggests a complex pattern that may include dispersal from long-hydroperiod sites to the short-hydroperiod sites, and persistence in local refuges. The exact role of dispersal in re-establishing short-hydroperiod fish populations appears to depend on local topography and ambient rainfall. On the other hand, our data are consistent with the long-held hypothesis that small fish species experience less predation from piscivorous fish in short-hydroperiod than in long-hydroperiod habitats. This hypothesis predicts that these fishes should experience longer life spans in short-hydroperiod sites, as we observed. More research is needed on the relative role of immigration as a mechanism to sustain small fish populations in short-hydroperiod marshes of the Everglades. This study suggests that management models of fishes must incorporate rapid recovery from drought events. Some species may experience greater population growth rates in short-hydroperiod habitats, although ultimate population sizes may be limited by periodic dry down, site productivity, and other factors.
graphs of length versus age at WCA Sites 5, 8, and 11 and SRS Sites 7, 37, and 50
Figure 4. Size-age relationships for female sailfin mollies from our six study sites. The slopes of each line are indicative of growth rate. [larger image]

This research was funded through a cooperative agreement between the USGS and FIU under the Place-Based Studies initiative of the USGS (CA 1445-CA09-95- 0112, Sub-agreement No. 12).

Contact: Timothy, Konnert,
Dept. of Biological Sciences,
Florida International University,
University Park, Miami, FL 33199
Phone: 305-348-4032,
Konnertt@fiu.edu


(This abstract was taken from the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration (GEER) Open File Report 03-54)

left arrow Back to Project Homepage




| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/projects/lh_param/lhparam_geer03abs.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 03 September, 2003 @ 08:30 AM(KP)