USGS
South Florida Information Access


SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
projects > sedimentation, sea-level rise, and circulation in florida bay > abstract


Sea-Level Rise and the Future of Florida Bay in the Next Century

R.B. Halley, E.J. Prager, R.P. Stumpf, K.K. Yates, and C.H. Holmes

During the next century, the physiography of Florida Bay will change due to a complex interplay between sediment production, transport, and accumulation and the local, relative rate of sea-level rise. Some estimates have predicted that the Bay will eventually fill with sediments and become part of the Everglades (Enos and Perkins, 1979). Others suggest erosion and removal of sediment in the Bay (Wanless and Tagett, 1989). Recent estimates of sediment production (Bosence, 1989; Halley and Yates, unpublished), transport (Stumpf and others, in press), and accumulation (Holmes and others, in press) indicate neither of these scenarios is correct. Rather, more subtle and complex changes will continue the slow evolution of the Bay that has characterized it this and the last century.

The bulk (60 percent) of Florida Bay sediments which have been accumulating for approximately four thousand years (Scholl, 1964) occurs in mud banks, with much of the remainder (38 percent) in flanking deposits that spread over lake floors in the central and western parts of the Bay. Islands, tidal channel deltas, and filled solution holes account for only a few percent of the sediment in the Bay. Geochemical and constituent sediment analyses demonstrate that the sediment has formed mostly from the biota living in the bay. About 90 to 95 percent is carbonate skeletal debris and 5 to 10 percent is organic debris, mostly mangrove and seagrass. There is a small detrital fraction, generally less than a few percent, consisting of quartz, clays and dolomite (Prager and Halley, 1997). Size analyses of surface sediments result in a sand/mud ratio of about 3:2, but analyses of cores indicate the bulk of the sediment contains more mud with a sand/mud ratio of about 1:5. The sandy surface sediments result from winnowing processes that preferentially transport mud to mud banks leaving a sand veneer over large areas of the Bay floor.

Sediment is continuously produced by living organisms and is, eventually, remobilized by erosion. Erosion occurs along unprotected shorelines, exposed mud banks, and areas recently denuded by seagrass mortality. Eroding islands show the most rapid erosion rates, with shoreline retreat rates of some islands approaching 1 m yr-1. The presence or absence of seagrass is a first-order control of subtidal erosion and deposition. Some mud banks that erode on exposed margins are accreting on protected margins, causing a net migration on the order of 0.5 m yr-1. Areas of seagrass mortality may expose extremely fluid mud to erosion, redepositing several centimeters of sediment per year.

Wave modeling and measurement help researchers to understand the complexities of erosion and deposition and the importance of seagrass. Waves form in the basins and propagate most effectively across basins with long axes parallel to the wind. Refraction effectively turns waves parallel to the banks. However, seagrass effectively dampens out wave energy along bank margins (Prager and Halley, in press). If seagrass is absent, significant erosion may occur in these areas. Although summer thunderstorms account for some erosion and turbidity, remote sensing studies indicate that winter cold fronts account for most of the turbidity and sediment transport in the Bay. Turbidity patterns also reveal a seasonally consistent west-central clear zone, indicating that little sediment from the central and eastern Bay escapes the estuary (Stumpf and others, in press). Only hurricanes are energetic enough to redeposit sediment on islands and along shorelines.

Sedimentation rates between 0.5 and 2 cm yr-1 have been measured from the accreting margins of mud banks (Holmes and others, in press). These rates are almost an order of magnitude greater than sea-level rise and indicate the mud banks can outpace sea-level rise. However, coring reveals that mud banks are keeping up to sea level, not catching up or becoming islands. It is hypothesized that seagrass dynamics prevent the banks from growing above sea level. Periodic episodes of seagrass mortality, probably caused by excessive aerial exposure, limit the ability of the banks to accrete above the annual low tide.

Newly formed sediment is a minor contribution to the banks on the basis of studies using radiocarbon as a tracer of carbonate produced since thermonuclear atmospheric testing of the late 1950s and early 1960s, only a fraction of a percent of new carbonate sediment has been produced in the past 40 years. Although carbonate production rates are estimated in the range of 100s of gms m-2 yr-1 (Boscence, 1989), much of this production is redissolved (Walter and Burton, 1990). Net accumulation over the past 3,500 years has been approximately 0.2 mm yr-1 (2.2 gms m-2 yr-1). These production rates are similar to carbonate productivity estimates calculated from alkalinity and pH measurements made during the summer of 1998.

Production rates of a fraction of 1 mm yr-1, by themselves, are insufficient to keep up with sealevel rise. But the continuous redistribution of sediment, preferentially accumulating in seagrass on mud banks, will maintain the banks at approximately the annual low tide mark. The basins, on the other hand, will slowly deepen as sediment is transported by wave action and residual circulation to the margins of the mud banks. The deepening will approximate the rate of sea-level rise. The long-term evolution of Florida Bay, forced by sedimentation and sea-level change, define the context within which more recent changes such as seagrass die-off and algae blooms occur. It is important to consider recent ecological change in light of this dynamic setting.

REFERENCES

Boscence, D., 1989, Biogenic carbonate production in Florida Bay: Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 44, pt. 1, p. 419-433.

Enos, P., and Perkins, R.D., 1979, Evolution of Florida Bay from island stratigraphy: Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part I, v. 90, p. 59-83.

Holmes, C.W., Robbins, J.A., Halley, R.B., Bothner, M., tenBrink, M., and Marot, M., in press, Sedimentary dynamics of Florida Bay Mud Banks on a decadal time scale: Journal of Coastal Research.

Prager, E.J., and Halley, R.B., 1997, Bottom types of Florida Bay: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-526.

Prager, E.J., and Halley, R.B., in press, The influence of seagrass on shell layers and Florida Bay mud banks: Journal of Coastal Research.

Scholl, D.W., 1964, Recent sedimentary record in mangrove swamps and rise in sea level over the southwestern coast of Florida, Parts I and II: Journal of Marine Geology, v. 1, p. 344-366.

Stumpf, R.P., Frayer, M.L., Durako, M.D., and Brock, J.C., in press, Variations in water clarity in Florida Bay from 1985 to 1997: Estuaries.

Walter, L.M., and Burton, E.A., 1990, Dissolution of recent platform carbonate sediments in marine pore fluids: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 601-643.

Wanless, H.R., and Tagett, M.G., 1989, Origin, growth, and evolution of carbonate mudbanks in Florida Bay: Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 44, no.1, p. 454-489.


(This abstract was taken from the Proceedings of the South Florida Restoration Science Forum Open File Report)

Back to Project Homepage


U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov /projects/circulation/circabsfrsf.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 11 June, 2007 @ 10:28 AM(TJE)