
|
|
projects > sedimentation, sea-level rise, and circulation in florida bay > abstract
Sea-Level Rise and the Future of Florida Bay in the Next CenturyR.B. Halley, E.J. Prager, R.P. Stumpf, K.K. Yates, and C.H. Holmes During the next century, the physiography of Florida Bay will change due to a complex interplay between sediment production, transport, and accumulation and the local, relative rate of sea-level rise. Some estimates have predicted that the Bay will eventually fill with sediments and become part of the Everglades (Enos and Perkins, 1979). Others suggest erosion and removal of sediment in the Bay (Wanless and Tagett, 1989). Recent estimates of sediment production (Bosence, 1989; Halley and Yates, unpublished), transport (Stumpf and others, in press), and accumulation (Holmes and others, in press) indicate neither of these scenarios is correct. Rather, more subtle and complex changes will continue the slow evolution of the Bay that has characterized it this and the last century. The bulk (60 percent) of Florida Bay sediments which have been accumulating for approximately four thousand years (Scholl, 1964) occurs in mud banks, with much of the remainder (38 percent) in flanking deposits that spread over lake floors in the central and western parts of the Bay. Islands, tidal channel deltas, and filled solution holes account for only a few percent of the sediment in the Bay. Geochemical and constituent sediment analyses demonstrate that the sediment has formed mostly from the biota living in the bay. About 90 to 95 percent is carbonate skeletal debris and 5 to 10 percent is organic debris, mostly mangrove and seagrass. There is a small detrital fraction, generally less than a few percent, consisting of quartz, clays and dolomite (Prager and Halley, 1997). Size analyses of surface sediments result in a sand/mud ratio of about 3:2, but analyses of cores indicate the bulk of the sediment contains more mud with a sand/mud ratio of about 1:5. The sandy surface sediments result from winnowing processes that preferentially transport mud to mud banks leaving a sand veneer over large areas of the Bay floor. Sediment is continuously produced by living organisms and is, eventually, remobilized by erosion. Erosion occurs along unprotected shorelines, exposed mud banks, and areas recently denuded by seagrass mortality. Eroding islands show the most rapid erosion rates, with shoreline retreat rates of some islands approaching 1 m yr-1. The presence or absence of seagrass is a first-order control of subtidal erosion and deposition. Some mud banks that erode on exposed margins are accreting on protected margins, causing a net migration on the order of 0.5 m yr-1. Areas of seagrass mortality may expose extremely fluid mud to erosion, redepositing several centimeters of sediment per year.
Wave modeling and measurement help researchers to understand the complexities of erosion and deposition and the importance of seagrass. Waves form in the basins and propagate most effectively across basins with long axes parallel to the wind. Refraction effectively turns waves parallel to the banks. However, seagrass effectively dampens out wave energy along bank margins (Prager and Halley, in press). If seagrass is absent, significant erosion may occur in these areas. Although summer thunderstorms account for some erosion and turbidity, remote sensing studies indicate that winter cold fronts account for most of the turbidity and sediment transport in the Bay. Turbidity patterns also reveal a seasonally consistent west-central clear zone, indicating that little sediment from the central and eastern Bay escapes the estuary (Stumpf and others, in press). Only hurricanes are energetic enough to redeposit sediment on islands and along shorelines.
Sedimentation rates between 0.5 and 2 cm yr Newly formed sediment is a minor contribution to the banks on the basis of studies using radiocarbon as a tracer of carbonate produced since thermonuclear atmospheric testing of the late 1950s and early 1960s, only a fraction of a percent of new carbonate sediment has been produced in the past 40 years. Although carbonate production rates are estimated in the range of 100s of gms m Production rates of a fraction of 1 mm yr REFERENCES
Boscence, D., 1989, Biogenic carbonate production in Florida Bay: Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 44, pt. 1, p. 419-433. Enos, P., and Perkins, R.D., 1979, Evolution of Florida Bay from island stratigraphy: Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part I, v. 90, p. 59-83.
Holmes, C.W., Robbins, J.A., Halley, R.B., Bothner, M., tenBrink, M., and Marot, M., in press, Sedimentary dynamics of Florida Bay Mud Banks on a decadal time scale: Journal of Coastal Research.
Prager, E.J., and Halley, R.B., 1997, Bottom types of Florida Bay: U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-526.
Prager, E.J., and Halley, R.B., in press, The influence of seagrass on shell layers and Florida Bay mud banks: Journal of Coastal Research.
Scholl, D.W., 1964, Recent sedimentary record in mangrove swamps and rise in sea level over the southwestern coast of Florida, Parts I and II: Journal of Marine Geology, v. 1, p. 344-366.
Stumpf, R.P., Frayer, M.L., Durako, M.D., and Brock, J.C., in press, Variations in water clarity in Florida Bay from 1985 to 1997: Estuaries.
Walter, L.M., and Burton, E.A., 1990, Dissolution of recent platform carbonate sediments in marine pore fluids: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 601-643.
Wanless, H.R., and Tagett, M.G., 1989, Origin, growth, and evolution of carbonate mudbanks in Florida Bay: Bulletin of Marine Science, v. 44, no.1, p. 454-489.
(This abstract was taken from the Proceedings of the South Florida Restoration Science Forum Open File Report)
|
| U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov /projects/circulation/circabsfrsf.html Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster Last updated: 11 June, 2007 @ 10:28 AM(TJE) |