USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Flow Effects on Greater Everglades Ecosystems

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Flow Effects on Greater Everglades Ecosystems
Abstract:
The overall objective is to conduct the needed field experiments to quantify the relative importance of hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological processes to help determine the most effective means of preserving and restoring topographic heterogeneity and biotic diversity of the Everglades Ridge and Slough Landscape.

Our proposed experiments and modeling are fundamental to building a reliable predictive capability of how the Everglades will respond to the restoration’s higher flows.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Judson Harvey Gregory Noe; Raymond Schaffranek (retired), Unpublished Material, Flow Effects on Greater Everglades Ecosystems.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -81
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.25
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 26.5
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.125

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2008
    Ending_Date: 2010
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: project

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Everglades Ridge amd Slough

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Project personnel include: Laurel Larsen, Jeff Woods, Morgan Franklin, and Lauren McPhillips

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Judson W. Harvey
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Project Chief
    430 National Center
    Reston, VA 20192

    703 648-5876 (voice)
    703 648 5484 (FAX)
    jwharvey@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

A growing concern is that augmenting Everglades sheet flow to benefit the hydrology of certain downstream areas could have unintended consequences to other areas, such as transporting surface-water contaminants farther into the central and southern parts of the Everglades ecosystem than ever before. Therefore, an important specific objective is to determine how far downstream suspended sediments and associated nutrients will be transported as a result of reconnected hydrology and higher sheetflow velocities.

Additional scientific questions that must be answered to support The Water Conservation Area 3A Decompartmentalization and Sheet Flow Enhancement Project (DECOMP) include:

1. How do the characteristic ridge and slough topographic variation and its associated vegetation patterns influence the sources, transport rates, rates of interception, and storage residence times of suspended particulates and nutrients? 2. What are relative roles of transport of fine suspended particulate matter and coarser flocculent benthic organic matter (floc) in suspended sediment and phosphorus budgets in Everglades wetlands? 3. To what extent will sources, concentrations, and transport distances of suspended sediments and nutrients in Everglades wetlands be altered by DECOMP? Will increased sheet flow velocities or the extent of canal backfilling after levee removal be the more important driver of changes in transport? 4. What flow velocities are necessary to entrain and redistribute sediment in the ridge and slough landscape?


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Not complete (process 1 of 1)
    Methods to quantify sheetflow velocities in the Everglades using acoustic Doppler methods have only recently been made reliable and have demonstrated that relatively low velocities now characterize even the areas with relatively well preserved ridge and slough characteristics (Shaffranek and others, 2004).

    Up to now our team has focused its experimental research at two research sites: northern Shark Slough, and more recently, at site 3A-5 in north central Water Conservation Area 3A, an area that has proved to be an excellent "reference" site for measuring transport rates and processes in remnant conditions where ridge and slough topography is relatively well preserved. This research is providing perspective on pre-drainage conditions which is critical to understanding the flow-topography-sediment interactions that occurred in the historic flow regime and topography of the Everglades. Among our accomplishments is developing the techniques that will be applied in the near future to characterize flow and transport conditions in areas possessing more degraded landscape characteristics.

    Starting in FY08 our investigations of "reference" conditions at our WCA-3A-5 will be supplemented by adding "first response" research sites in WCA-3B, where we will have the ability to test our predictions within the framework of the Decompartmentalization Physical Model’s (DPM) landscape-scale manipulation of sheet flow in an area of degraded landscape characteristics. Those sites will possess substantially degraded ridge and slough topography and will be located downstream of where substantial levee removal is expected to take place (i.e., WCA-3B). Preliminary planning is already underway for the DPM, a long-term, landscape-scale experiment. The overall purpose of DPM is to test hydrologic and ecosystem-level responses to opening of large gaps in levees and filling of canals at a large but manageable experimental scale. The USGS role will be to conduct the experimental and modeling work to assess how increased sheetflow across various levels of levee removal and canal backfill designs perform in terms of transport of sediments and associated nutrients to downstream areas. A 3-year test period is planned which will not only reveal the first response characteristics of levee removal and increased sheetflow, but which will establish the sites and protocols for further evaluation in later years to assess the long term geomorphic and ecosystem-level changes that can be expected over a large proportion of the central Everglades after DECOMP is fully implemented

    After first developing our tracer experimental methods in Shark Slough (Saiers and others, 2003; Harvey and others, 2005) and our methods for suspended particle sampling in a cross-system comparison of the Water Conservation Areas and Everglades National Park (Noe and others, 2007), we have most recently focused our attention on measuring flow and sediment transport in the ridge and slough environments of Water Conservation Area 3 as they relate to flow velocity, vegetation type and density, and sources of water to WCA3 (e.g. precipitation and structure inflows). Modeling is underway to interpret the controlling processes on velocity and shear stress as they differ within ridge and slough plant communities (Harvey and others and Larsen and others, in preparation) and effects of flow, meteorological conditions, and vegetation communities on suspended particle abundance, sources, size distribution, and phosphorus content (Noe and others, in preparation)

    In FY08 we will build upon our previous work by quantifying the entrainment, transport, biogeochemistry, and sources of suspended particles under a range of experimental flow velocities. The most important improvement in the planned experiments is the use of an underwater camera and a Sequoia Scientific LISST-100X laser diffraction particle size analyzer (LISST-100x) to detect movement of natural suspended particulates rather than the fluorescent or mineral "model" particles that we introduced in previous experiments with our Yale University colleagues (Saiers and others, 2003; Huang and others, 2008). Use of natural particles in these experiments is essential to reliably characterize "entrainment" of suspended particulates under the naturally complex conditions of mixed particle sizes that arise from several different sources of organic matter (e.g., fine suspended vs. coarse floc). Of particular importance is determining the threshold conditions of sheetflow velocity and bed shear stress that cause entrainment of floc, and determining whether and under what flow conditions those particles will experience a net redistribution from slough to ridge. We will also test the ability of spectral analysis of suspended material and other ecosystem components (floc, peat, different forms of periphyton, macrophytes) to identify the source(s) of suspended material under the different experimental flow velocities in ridge and slough. Visible and near-infrared reflectance spesctroscopy has been used to differentiate plant communities in the Everglades for remote sensing (John Jones, USGS, personal communication) and to assess wetland soil characteristics in general (Cohen and others, 2005). We will conduct preliminary sampling to evaluate the ability of this method to distinguish the potential sources of particles and develop spectral source mixing models for suspended particles, and then possibly apply the method in the flow experiments. Finally, in addition to measuring changes in suspended sediment concentrations, flux, and sources across the experimental flow velocities, we will also quantify the forms of phosphorus associated with fine suspended particles and floc through sequential chemical extractions. Understanding the quality of entrained sediment is necessary to predict its fate at downstream locations of retention.

    Modeling will be used to interpret the results of tracer experiments, with the goal to produce a fundamental set of transport parameters representing the role of fine suspended particles, floc, and storage of water and solutes in relatively slow-moving areas of thick vegetation and subsurface pore water.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Judson W. Harvey
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Project Chief
    430 National Center
    Reston, VA 20192

    703 648-5876 (voice)
    703 648 5484 (FAX)
    jwharvey@usgs.gov

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Harvey J. W. Saiers, J. E.; Newlin, J. T., 2005, Solute transport and storage mechanisms in wetlands of the Everglades, south Florida: Water Resources Research v. 41 n. 5, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Posted on SOFIA with permission from the American Geophysical Union

    accessed as of 4/26/2011

    Saiers, James E. Harvey, Judson W.; Mylon, S, 2003, Surface-water transport of suspended matter through wetland vegetation of the Florida everglades: Geophysical Research Letters v. 30 n. 19, 1987, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Copyright by the American Geophysical Union. Posted on SOFIA with permission

    accessed as of 4/26/2011

    Noe, Gregory B. Childers, Daniels L., 200701, Phosphorus budgets in Everglades wetland ecosystems: the effects of hydrology and nutrient enrichment: Wetlands Ecology and Management v 15, no. 3, Springer+Business Media B. V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Copyright 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B. V.. Posted with permission.

    accessed as of 4/26/2011

    Noe, G. B. Harvey, J. W.; Saiers, J. E, 2007, Characterization of suspended particles in Everglades wetlands: Limnology and Oceanography v. 52, no. 3, American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011
    Huang, Y. H. Saiers, J. E.; Harvey, J. , 200804, Advection, dispersion, and filtration of fine particles within emergent vegetation of the Florida Everglades: Water Resources Research v. 44, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011
    Schaffranek, Raymond W. Riscassi, Ami L., 2004, Flow velocity, water temperature, and conductivity at selected locations in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida: July 1999 - July 2003: USGS Digital Data Series 2004-110, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011
    Harvey, Judson W. McCormick, Paul V., 200902, Groundwater's significance to changing hydrology, water chemistry, and biological communities of a floodplain ecosystem: Hydrogeology Journal v. 17, n. 1, Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    accessed as of 4/26/2011

    The article was originally published in the Hydrogeology Journal.

    Harvey, Judson W. Schaffranek, Raymond W.; No, 20090328, Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low-gradient floodplain: Water Resources Research v. 45, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011
    Larsen, Laurel G. Harvey, Judson W.; Crimaldi, 2009, Morphologic and transport properties of natural floc: Water Resources Research v. 45, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011
    Larsen, Laurel G. Harvey, Judson W.; Noe, Gre, 20090114, Predicting organic floc transport dynamics in shallow aquatic ecosystems: Insights from the field, the laboratory, and numerical modeling: Water Resources Research v. 45, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: accessed as of 4/26/2011


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    unknown

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    unknown


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 02-May-2011
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/susparts_p2.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Mon May 02 08:43:33 2011