USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Spatial and Age-Structured Population Model of the American Crocodile for Comparisons of CERP Restoration Alternatives

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Spatial and Age-Structured Population Model of the American Crocodile for Comparisons of CERP Restoration Alternatives
Abstract:
To adequately understand crocodile populations and model population growth, existing data must be assembled and model parameters estimated. A simulation model can then be constructed and validated both with existing data and through expert opinion. A crocodile population model to simulate the south Florida ecosystem under varying management strategies is vital to evaluating and assessing restoration success under CERP.

The objectives of this project are to:

1. Build an age and spatially structured crocodile population model suitable for comparison of CERP restoration alternatives. 2. Couple the local age-structured models into a spatial dispersal model incorporating crocodile movement behavior. 3. Use spatial parameter maps from the Florida Everglades as driving functions on the spatially structured model and to construct crocodile finite rate of increase maps under different management regimes. 4. Perform sensitivity analysis on the model parameters, and release model concept and code for peer-review.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Daniel H. Slone Kenneth G. Rice; Frank J. Mazzotti, Unpublished Material, Spatial and Age-Structured Population Model of the American Crocodile for Comparisons of CERP Restoration Alternatives.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -81.42
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.28
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 26.68
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.21
    Description_of_Geographic_Extent: southern Everglades

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2008
    Ending_Date: 2009
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

  8. What biological taxa does this data set concern?

    Taxonomy:
    Keywords/Taxon:
    Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: ITIS
    Taxonomic_Keywords: animals
    Taxonomic_System:
    Classification_System/Authority:
    Classification_System_Citation:
    Citation_Information:
    Originator:
    U.S. Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Department of the Interior - U.S. Geological Survey Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Smithsonian Institution - National Museum of Natural History (NMNH)

    Publication_Date: 2000
    Title: Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Database
    Other_Citation_Details:
    Retrieved from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System on-line database, <http://www.itis.gov>.
    Online_Linkage: <http://www.itis.gov>
    Taxonomic_Procedures: unknown
    Taxonomic_Completeness: unknown
    General_Taxonomic_Coverage: American crocodiles are identified to the species level
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
    Applicable_Common_Name: animals
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
    Applicable_Common_Name: chordates
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
    Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrates
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Reptilia
    Applicable_Common_Name: reptiles
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Crocodilia
    Applicable_Common_Name: alligators
    Applicable_Common_Name: crocodiles
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Crocodylidae
    Applicable_Common_Name: crocodiles
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Crocodylus
    Applicable_Common_Name: crocodiles
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Crocodylus acutus
    Applicable_Common_Name: American alligator


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Project personnel includes Timothy W. Green

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Tim Green
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Crown Pointe

    2201 NW 40th Terrace
    Gainesville, FL 32605
    USA

    352 264-3556 (voice)
    352 374-8080 (FAX)
    tgreen@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

The American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) is a federally endangered top consumer in south Florida, imperiled primarily by habitat loss due to expansion of a rapidly growing human population along coastal areas of Palm Beach, Broward, Dade, and Monroe counties. This loss of habitat has principally affected the nesting range of crocodiles, restricting nesting to a small area of northeastern Florida Bay and northern Key Largo by the early 1970's. When crocodiles were listed as endangered in 1975, scant data were available for making informed management decisions. Field and laboratory data suggested that low nest success, combined with high hatchling mortality, provided a dim prognosis for survival. Because of their small size, hatchling crocodiles are vulnerable to biotic and abiotic stressors, such as high levels of salinity. To grow and survive, hatchling crocodiles need to find food and benign environmental conditions (or at least avoid harsh conditions) and avoid predators. Diminished growth rates and higher mortaity or dispersal rates have been associated with areas that pose greater risk to hatchling crocodiles.

Crocodiles now occur in most of the habitat that remains for them in southern Florida. Most of the remaining habitat is currently protected in public ownership or engaged in energy production. In these areas, further loss of habitat is not an issue. However, questions of potential habitat modification through continued alteration of freshwater flow due to upstream development and potential curtailment of the range of crocodiles need to be addressed. Patterns of nesting, relative abundance and distribution, growth, and survival of crocodiles can provide insight into restoration of coastal ecosystems in Southeast Florida. For both Florida Bay and Biscayne Bay, restoring a more natural pattern of freshwater flow would provide the most benefit. Characteristics of flow patterns into Florida and Biscayne Bays that are beneficial for crocodiles include sheet flow through the fringing mangrove swamp that extends well into the dry season. Mid-to late dry season discharges of freshwater that cause a reversal of water levels in the receiving body are hypothesized to cause a dispersal of prey items, making them less available to crocodiles. If so, such discharges should be avoided. Shifting water delivery from Biscayne Bay to Florida Bay would degrade the quality of habitat in Biscayne Bay for crocodiles.

Restoration efforts in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) will likely cause changes to salinity levels throughout the habitat of the American crocodile. Changes in salinity were seen after previous hydrologic changes in the area, when reduced freshwater flow was associated with increased salinity levels in Florida Bay estuaries, including one of the core nesting areas of the American crocodile. Large crocodiles are not significantly affected by high salinity, but previous work has shown that high salinity levels may reduce survival of hatchlings and juveniles. The detrimental effects of high salinity on hatchling and juvenile crocodiles has led to the hypothesis that increased freshwater flow to the estuaries will increase the animals' distribution, abundance, and growth.


How was the data set created?

  1. What methods were used to collect the data?

    Method 0 of 1
    Type: Lab

    We will estimate population parameters of the crocodile across hydrological and habitat gradients from available databases (Mazzotti and Cherkiss 2003). Through the development of population simulation models based on these empirical data, we will evaluate restoration alternatives and assess restoration performance measures. By applying crocodile models to restoration alternatives and predicting population responses, we can choose alternatives that result in biotic characteristics that best approach historical conditions and identify future research needs.

  2. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  3. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 2008 (process 1 of 1)
    The methods we will use for the American crocodile population model will be similar to those used in the ATLSS model of American alligator growth and dispersal, authored by D.H. Slone, J.C. Allen, and K.G. Rice (Slone et al. 2003), though there will necessarily be several major changes made to accommodate the different use of habitat, different driving parameters (salinity), and different dispersal parameters for crocodiles. We prefer a stage-space based model rather than an individual-based model for this purpose because it allows us to simultaneously evaluate landscape effects on each stage of the crocodile, and predict spatial density patterns and population size with much greater computational efficiency.

    The crocodile model will be based on the ATLSS Alligator Population Model, which has been completed and has undergone expert review, calibration, and some validation. An Ecologist was hired late in FY-2007 to work on this task. He has begun training in Matlab programming, and is reviewing the alligator model. Meetings with crocodilian biologists are planned for the near future to outline changes that need to be made from the alligator model, and to begin parameterization of the crocodile model.

    In FY2008 we will:

    1. Build an age and spatially structured crocodile population model suitable for comparison of CERP restoration alternatives. 2. Couple the local age-structured models into a spatial dispersal model incorporating crocodile movement behavior.

    In objective 1, we will represent the age-structured crocodile population as a 3-dimensional array indexing the number in an age group at a spatial location with space assumed to be 2-dimensional, subject to the effects on crocodile parameters relative to the hydrology effects brought on by elevation changes. The net effect will be that we can still use a 2-d spatial representation of the population. We will use a size-class structured version with a Lefkovitch projection matrix having partial class development in each time step. We note that since we can construct the projection matrix at each location, then we can obtain its largest eigenvalue, which will indicate whether the population will increase (l > 1) or decrease (l < 1) at each location. This will enable us to make maps of crocodile population growth and decline over time.

    In objective 2, we will include movement and dispersal of certain age groups in the spatial map. We will introduce spatial structure into ecological models by using a discrete spatial convolution model

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Tim Green
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Crown Pointe

    2201 NW 40th Terrace
    Gainesville, FL 32605
    USA

    352 264-3556 (voice)
    352 374-8080 (FAX)
    tgreen@usgs.gov

  4. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Slone, D. H. Rice, K. G.; Allen, J. C., 2003, Model evaluates influence of Everglades restoration plan on alligator populations (Florida): Ecological Restoration V. 21, n. 2, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

    Mazzotti, F. J. Cherkiss, M. S., 2003, Status and Conservation of the American Crocodile in Florida: Recovering an Endangered Species While Restoring an Endangered Ecosystem: Technical Report Final report V. 1, University of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Prepared for the National Park Service

    accessed as of 6/29/2010


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    unavailable

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    unknown


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 30-Jun-2010
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Part 1: Biological Data Profile (FGDC-STD-001.1-1999)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/pop_model_am-croc.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Wed Jun 30 09:52:07 2010