USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Influence of Hydrology on Life-History Parameters of Common Freshwater Fishes from Southern Florida

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Influence of Hydrology on Life-History Parameters of Common Freshwater Fishes from Southern Florida
Abstract:
We have made three collections of the large-bodied fishes from canal sites, taken otoliths from over 700 specimens, and set up a dozen large tanks in the mesocosm facility in ENP. There we have used pit-tags to individually mark several dozen fishes of five target species that have been injected with oxytetracycline to place a mark on their hard tissues. These fishes will be maintained in the mesocosm for over one year to validate the deposition of annual or semiannual rings. We are determining the best method of classifying the ova of the fishes as to stage of readiness. We have dissected the gonads from more than 800 fishes for this analysis. For the small fish segment, we have sorted collections of fishes from the two hydroperiod sites and are dissecting them to collect the tiny otoliths, and to perform preliminary examinations of the gonads. We are also beginning to raise captive fishes for aging validation. Field collections will continue for two years and lab/statistical analyses for another year.
Supplemental_Information:
This project was completed in 2003. It was continued as Quantitative Sampling of Freshwaster Fish Species within the Big Cypress National Preserve: A Long-Term Research Project to Evaluate the Ecological Effects of CERP
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    William F. Loftus (retired) Leo Nico; Joel trexler, 2005, Influence of Hydrology on Life-History Parameters of Common Freshwater Fishes from Southern Florida.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -81.75
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.75
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 26.3
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.5
    Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Big Cypress National Preserve

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 1999
    Ending_Date: 2003
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: project

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Big Cypress National Preserve

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

  8. What biological taxa does this data set concern?

    Taxonomy:
    Keywords/Taxon:
    Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: none
    Taxonomic_Keywords: animals
    Taxonomic_Keywords: fish
    Taxonomic_Keywords: multiple species
    Taxonomic_System:
    Classification_System/Authority:
    Classification_System_Citation:
    Citation_Information:
    Originator:
    Turgeon, D. D.

    Quinn, J. F., Jr.; Bogan, A. E.; Coan, E. V.; Hochberg, F. G.; Lyons, W. G.; Mikkelsen, P. M.; Neves, R. J.; Roper, C. F. E.; Rosenberg, G.; Roth, B.; Scheltema, A.; Thompson, F. G.; Vecchione, M.; Williams, J. D.

    Publication_Date: 1998
    Title:
    Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: mollusks
    Edition: 2nd
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: publication
    Series_Information:
    Series_Name: Special Publication
    Issue_Identification: 26
    Publication_Information:
    Publication_Place: Bethesda, MD
    Publisher: American Fisheries Society
    Taxonomic_Procedures:
    Sampling was conducted according to a stratified design based on habitat type. The majority of sites were located within 250 meters of roads or trails passable by truck to simplify access. Sites were also reached by boat, all-terrain vehicle, helicopter, and airboat when these means of transportation were available. Habitat heterogeneity made random selection of sites difficult, particularly during the dry season, as no sufficiently detailed hydrology data existed to insure that randomly selected sites would be inundated. In those cases, sites were haphazardly selected to insure the presence of standing surface water.

    The diversity of habitat types in Big Cypress presents considerable challenges to the development of a comprehensive sampling regime, as the effectiveness of any given methodology varies between habitats. To compensate for this, numerous techniques were employed during this study. A variety of fish traps have been used extensively, as well as electrofishing gear, gill nets, cast nets, dip nets, and angling.

    The location of each sampling site was recorded as universal transverse mercator (UTM) coordinates using a Garmin Etrex Vista GPS.

    Project personnel collected and curated representative vouchers for all captured species whenever practical. Specimens too large to effectively preserve have been documented photographically using a digital camera. Vouchers have been collected independently for each habitat type sampled. Additionally, to ensure complete spatial coverage of the preserve, vouchers of each species have been collected from the north, central, and southern regions of Big Cypress. Information regarding each voucher was entered into the project Access database, and each was assigned a unique identifier to link with related sampling information. Voucher collection is an ongoing process and will continue for the duration of the study. Upon completion of this project, vouchers will be transferred to an NPS-identified repository.

    Taxonomic_Completeness:
    For each sample, all specimens were identified to species, and total catch per species recorded. Total lengths.were measured for the first 20 randomly selected individuals of each species to obtain a representative size distribution. Water temperature, pH, salinity, and dissolved oxygen were measured for each site when possible, however, instrumentation problems precluded this for much of the year. Project personnel borrowed a Hydrolab 4a minisonde and datalogger from the BICY hydrology department to resolve these problems. For electrofishing expeditions, water conductivity was determined using a YSI-33 conductivity meter.
    General_Taxonomic_Coverage: Specimens were identified to species
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Osteichthyes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Actinopterygii
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Neopterygii
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraclass
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Teleostei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Acanthopterygii
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Atheriniformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Atherinopsidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Menidiinae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Labidesthes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Labidesthes sicculus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Menidia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Menidia beryllina
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Beloniformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Belonoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Scomberesocoidea
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Belonidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Strongylura
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Strongylura marina
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Strongylura notata
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Strongylura timucu
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodontiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodontoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodontidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodontinae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Tribe
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodontini
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodon
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinodon variegatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Floridichthys
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Floridichthys carpio
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Jordanella
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Jordanella floridae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Adinia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Adinia xenica
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus chrysotus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus confluentus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus grandis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus seminolis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Fundulus similis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lucania
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lucania goodei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lucania parva
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Poeciliidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Poeciliinae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Belonesox
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Belonesox belizanus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Gambusia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Gambusia holbrooki
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Heterandria
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Heterandria formosa
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Poecilia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Poecilia latipinna
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Mugiliformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Mugilidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Mugil
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Mugil cephalus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Perciformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elassomatoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elassomatidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elassoma
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elassoma evergladei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Gobioidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Gobiidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Bathygobius
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Bathygobius soporator
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lophogobius
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lophogobius cyprinoides
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Microgobius
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Microgobius gulosus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Labroidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cichlidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Astronotus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Astronotus ocellatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cichlasoma
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cichlasoma bimaculatum
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cichlasoma urophthalma
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Chiclasoma managuensis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Oreochromis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Oreochromis aureus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Tilapia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Tilapia mariae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Percoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Carangidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Caranx
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Caranx hippos
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Centrarchidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis macrochirus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis marginatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis microlophus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis punctatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepomis gulosus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Micropterus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Micropterus salmoides
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Pomoxis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Pomoxis nigromaculatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Centropomidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Centropominae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Centropomus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Centropomus undecimalis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Echeneidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Echeneis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Echeneis naucrates
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Gerreidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eucinostomus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eucinostomus harengulus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eucinostomus gula
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eugerres
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eugerres plumieri
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lutjanidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lutjaninae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lutjanus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lutjanus griseus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Percidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Etheostoma
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Etheostoma fusiforme
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Sciaenidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Sciaenops
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Sciaenops ocellatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Sparidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Archosargus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Archosargus probatocephalus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lagodon
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lagodon rhomboides
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Pleuronectiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Pleuronectoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Achiridae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Achirus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Achirus lineatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Trinectes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Trinectes maculatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Synbranchiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Synbranchoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Synbranchidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Monopterus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Monopterus albus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clupeomorpha
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clupeiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clupeoidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Engraulidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Engraulinae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anchoa
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anchoa mitchilli
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elopomorpha
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anguilliformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Suborder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anguilloidei
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anguillidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anguilla
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Anguilla rostrata
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elopiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elopidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elops
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Elops saurus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Megalopidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Megalops
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Megalops atlanticus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ostariophysi
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cypriniformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cobitoidea
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Catostomidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Catostominae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Tribe
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Moxostomatini
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Erimyzon
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Erimyzon sucetta
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinoidea
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyprinidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Notemigonus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Notemigonus crysoleucas
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Notropis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Notropis maculatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Notropis petersoni
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Siluriformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ariidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Arius
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ariopsis felis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Callichthyidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Callichthyinae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Hoplosternum
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Hoplosternum littorale
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clariidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clarias
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Clarias batrachus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ictaluridae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ameiurus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ameiurus natalis
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ameiurus nebulosus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ictalurus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Ictalurus punctatus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Noturus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Noturus gyrinus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Protacanthopterygii
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Esociformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Esocidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Esox
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Esox americanus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Esox niger
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Amiiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Amiidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Amia
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Amia calva
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Semionotiformes
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepisosteidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepisosteus
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Lepisosteus platyrhincus


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Personnel from The National Audubon Society are collaborators in this project.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Joel Trexler
    Florida International University, Department of Biological Sciences
    11208 S.W. 8th Street
    Miami, FL 33199
    USA

    305 348-1966 (voice)
    305 348-4032 (FAX)
    trexlerj@fiu.edu


Why was the data set created?

The objectives of this project are to establish age-size relationships for 11 species of fishes, construct life-tables, study reproductive phenology and fecundity, and apply the data to simulation models and to field data time-series. Work on this project began in late 1999 and is divided into large-fish and small-fish segments.


How was the data set created?

  1. What methods were used to collect the data?

    Method 0 of 1
    Type: Field

    A variety of fish traps were used extensively as well as electrofishing gear, gill nets, cast nets, dip nets, and angling.

  2. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  3. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 1999 (process 1 of 3)
    In this study we propose to collect information for common large- and small-bodied species by taking advantage of existing or newly funded fish studies in south Florida. These include the throw-trap program for small-fish monitoring, and a new electrofishing study of larger native and introduced species in canals. From the electrofishing study, Dr. Nico and graduate student will focus on the collection of the following species:

    Non-indigenous species: Spotted tilapia (Tilapia mariae) - an abundant and widespread species;

    Native species: Florida gar (Lepisosteus platyrhincus) ÷ abundant predator on other fish and crustaceans; Yellow bullhead (Ameiurus natalis) ÷ most abundant catfish, and also a predator; Warmouth (Lepomis gulosus) - Common sunfish that preys o1i-vrayfish, shrimp, and fish; Spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus) ÷ Abundant sunfish that feeds on invertebrates.

    Samples of these species from canal habitats, where they are very abundant at drier times of year, will be preserved in formalin for gonadal examination, with another sample saved in ethanol to avoid damage to the calcium-rich hard tissues used for aging. We anticipate that it will be more difficult to collect adequate sample sizes of large fish at high-water times when they disperse from canals into wetlands. Dr. Nico plans to put in more effort at those times, and to supplement his collections with previously preserved specimens in our collections. Collections will be made quarterly throughout the year.

    For the small-bodied species, Dr. Trexler and I plan to concentrate on the following species that inhabit marsh habitats, and about which little life-history information is known. Age and growth information has been collected for some of the species (Haake and Dean 1983), but reproductive characteristics require study. These species, in total, represent the most numerous species in the marshes:

    Age and Growth data ÷ Sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna); Flagfish (Jordanella floridae); and Spotted sunfish (Information specifically on marsh populations of spotted sunfish is needed).

    Reproduction/phenology ÷ Least killifish (Heterandria formosa); Bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei); Golden topminnow (Fundulus chrysotus); Eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia hoibrooki); Sailfin molly; and Flagfish.

    We plan to use existing archived collections of fishes from our extensive spatial and temporal marsh studies for reproductive analyses of fecundity, size of maturity, seasonality of reproduction, and sex ratios. A companion effort to sample larval fish in the wetlands will provide data for recruitment patterns and effort. The preserved collections will be supplemented during routine sampling five times per year by fresh collections of fishes, which will be frozen or preserved in alcohol for otolith (earbone) analysis. The proposed work will include counts of daily rings on otoliths, and size-frequency analyses to create an age-at-size table for each species, and to estimate growth in different seasons and along the hydroperiod gradient. These studies will allow us to construct life-tables for the species under different conditions in the Everglades. Data from several years are needed because each year in the Everglades can be idiosyncratic. We plan to collect field data from at least two years, and supplement those data with previously collected samples to expand the temporal scope of the study.

    Date: 2001 (process 2 of 3)
    Work planned for 2001 included:

    Small-Bodied Species

    For the small-bodied species, Dr. Joel Trexler of Florida International University and his students will concentrate on the following species that inhabit marsh habitats and, about which, little life-history information is known. Age and growth information has been collected for some of the species (Haake and Dean 1983), but reproductive characteristics require study. These species, in total, represent the most numerous species in the marshes.

    Age and Size Relationships to Estimate Growth Rate - We will establish age-to-size relationships for three marsh fish species: sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna); flagfish (Jordanella floridae); and spotted sunfish (Information specifically on marsh populations of spotted sunfish is needed). These relationships will be estimated at one representative short (at Shark Valley) and one representative long hydroperiod location (at Shark River Slough). The proposed work will include counts of daily rings on otoliths, and size-frequency analyses to create an age-at-size table for each species, and to estimate growth in two different seasons. These studies will allow us to construct life-tables for the species under different conditions in the Everglades.

    We will conduct experimental rearing of these fishes to a known age in field cages in anticipation of otolith removal and interpretation. In past efforts, this approach has demonstrated a very high fidelity of daily ring deposition in sailfin mollies up to the age of 21 days. This result needs to be repeated and expanded to other species. For several reasons, ring deposition becomes less easily interpreted as fish age. These include that the thickness of ring width decreases with age making them increasingly difficult to discriminate, disease and physiological stress unrelated to age also affect deposition. With livebearing fishes it is possible to place neonates into the cages and raise fishes of known age. However, with spotted sunfish and flagfish it may be necessary to take fish of unknown age and mark their otoliths with tetracycline. This is accomplished by emersing the fish in a tetracycline solution that intercalates with the calcium deposited at that time. The rings deposited under these conditions glow under ultraviolet light. The fish is maintained in a cage for a period of time after marking and prior to otolith removal and analysis. The number of rings deposited after the tetracycline dip may then be callibrated with the time known to have passed. This is especially useful to calibrate aging in adult fishes.

    Reproduction/phenology - We will document reproductive phenology and output in six marsh fish species: least killifish (Heterandria formosa); bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei); golden topminnow (Fundulus chrysotus); eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki); sailfin molly; and flagfish. We will attempt to use existing archived collections of fishes from the extensive spatial and temporal marsh study collections for reproductive analyses of fecundity, size of maturity, seasonality of reproduction, and sex ratios. If sample sizes are inadequate, supplemental samples will be collected. A companion effort to sample larval fish in the wetlands will provide data for recruitment patterns and effort. The preserved collections will be supplemented during routine sampling five times per year by fresh collections of fishes, which will be frozen or preserved in alcohol for otolith (earbone) analysis. Estimates of reproductive biology will follow Trexler (1985) for livebearing species, and Heins et al. (1986) and Heins (1995) for egg-laying species.

    Data from several years are needed because each year in the Everglades can be idiosyncratic. Field data will be collected for a minimum of two years, and supplemented with previously collected samples to expand the temporal scope of the study.

    Large-Bodied Species

    Non-indigenous species: Spotted tilapia (Tilapia mariae) - an abundant and widespread species. Native species: Florida gar (Lepisosteus platyrhincus) - abundant predator on other fish and crustaceans; Yellow bullhead (Ameiurus natalis) - most abundant catfish, and also a predator; Warmouth (Chaetobryttus gulosus) - Common sunfish that preys on crayfish, shrimp, and fish; and Spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus) - Abundant sunfish that feeds on invertebrates.

    Samples of these species from canal habitats, where they are very abundant at drier times of year, will be made by Nico during periodic electrofishing trips to south Florida from Gainesville. Specimens will be preserved in formalin for gonadal examination, with a second sample will be saved in ethanol to avoid damage to the calcium-rich hard tissues used for aging. We anticipate that it will be more difficult to collect adequate sample sizes of large fish at high-water times when they disperse from canals into wetlands. Dr. Nico plans to put in more effort at those times, and to supplement his collections with previously preserved specimens from archived existing collections. Collections will be made quarterly throughout the year. The analytical procedures will be similar to those described for the small-bodied species, except that none of the large species appear to be fractional spawners. This makes the estimate of lifetime fecundity somewhat less problematic. For these long-lived species, we do not think it feasible to use daily otolith rings for aging because it becomes difficult to do so because the rings become indistinct. We will investigate this further in the pilot study, but may follow the usual procedure for large fishes of reading annular rings. With that, of course, we will have to validate the timing and frequency of "annualar" ring formation through marking of captive fishes.

    Date: 2003 (process 3 of 3)
    Work in 2003 included:

    1. Inventory of Freshwater Fish Species within the Big Cypress National Preserve, with emphasis on methods testing to design a long-term aquatic biota sampling program

    The goal of this project in FY03 is to inventory the freshwater fish in the Big Cypress National Preserve, and simultaneously test sampling methods and designs for a long-term aquatic biota research program for the Preserve. A major ecosystem of the South Florida area, the Big Cypress Swamp, is poorly understood in biological terms. The Department of Interior is responsible for management of most of this system, which is part of the Everglades Restoration Program (CERP). We propose to describe large and small fish and macro-invertebrate ecology in representative habitats of the Swamp in a multiyear study to provide basic inventory information on Swamp communities and ecological data for use in simulation models. The models will be used to plan and evaluate restoration actions during CERP. Presently, inappropriate data from the Everglades are used in the Swamp model.

    2. Life-History Characteristics of Common Everglades Fishes

    In the final year of this task, we will complete the laboratory analysis of additional and existing samples to assess the biology of the flagfish (Jordanella floridae) and bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei). The life-histories of the flagfish and bluefin killifish will be characterized from existing samples collected at two sites in Everglades National Park that represent different hydroperiod conditions. The analysis of previously collected samples of other large- and small-bodied species will be completed and the results written for publication Because we were unable to collect adequate samples of yellow bullhead catfish (Ameiurus natalis) from the canal sites, we plan to work with our cooperator, Dr. Trexler, to collect samples from marsh habitats for analysis. Dr. Trexler has an ongoing sampling program in the Everglades marsh during which he can collect the samples we need to finish this study component. He can collect samples five times during the year to provide samples from different seasons.

    Age-Size relationship: Small fishes collected the hydroperiod study sites in the Everglades marsh are being analyzed for otolith annular counts. The number of fish examined has been determined by the pilot study and is consistent with standard methods for this kind of work. Maximum life expectancy is being estimated by the estimating the ages of large specimens of the two species from our collections. In the large-fish segment, we are analyzing the results of our work with Florida gar and warmouth sunfish, while completing the work begun with spotted tilapia aging. Statistical analysis of the data has begun now that all data have been collected and error-checked. We have done preliminary work with yellow bullhead aging to determine the best tissue for this purpose and we proceed with this work once we have specimens in hand.

    Reproductive Biology. Our estimates of reproductive phenology and fecundity in egg-laying fishes have required the dissection of female fish to determine the number and developmental stage of ova. In addition, we have been recording the weight of female fish and of their ovaries for calculations of reproductive allocation. Female flagfish are batch spawners that produce a brood of eggs in discrete spawning events, while bluefin killifish are fractional spawners that release a small number of eggs on a routine basis. These two different modes of reproduction have posed challenges to life-history description. The time interval between breeding bouts and the relationship between egg counts from preserved females and actual number of eggs laid must be determined for flagfish. For bluefin killifish, we must estimate the daily egg production, and the distribution of female reproductive lifespans. To satisfactorily obtain these parameters for these two fishes, we have reared these fishes in mesocosm tanks and aquaria, and harvested eggs from nests (flagfish) or artificial spawning substrates (bluefin killifish

    In the large-fish segment, we will complete analysis of reproduction in Florida gar and other large-bodied species by dissection, gonadal examination, and preparation of a gonadal-somatic index for each species. We have also performed a literature review to determine reproductive parameters from other populations of these species. We will perform reproductive analyses with yellow bullheads once we receive specimens.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Joel Trexler
    Florida International University, Department of Biological Sciences
    11208 S.W. 8th Street
    Miami, FL 33199
    USA

    305 348-1966 (voice)
    305 348-4032 (FAX)
    trexlerj@fiu.edu

  4. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Loftus, William F., 2000, Inventory of the fishes in Everglades National Park: Florida Scientist v. 63, n.1, Florida Academy of Sciences, Orlando, FL.

    Lorenz, J. J. McIvor, C. C.; Powell , G. , 1997, A drop net and removable walkway used to quantitatively sample fishes over wetland surfaces in the dwarf mangroves of the southern Everglades: Wetlands v. 17, n. 3, p. 346-359, Society of Wetlands Scientists, McLean, VA.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    accessed as of 8/1/2011

    The full article is available via journal subscription or single article purchase. The abstract may be viewed on the website below.

    Duever, M. J. Carlson, J. E.; Meeder, J. , 1979, Resource inventory and analysis of the Big Cypress National Preserve: Center for Wetlands, UF-Gainesville and National Audubon Society, Naples, FL.

    Loftus, W. F. Eklund, A. M., 1994, Long-term dynamics of an Everglades fish community: St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Chapter 19 in Everglades: the system and its restoration

    S. Davis and J. C. Ogden, editors

    Trexler, J. C. Loftus, W. F., 2001, Analysis of relationships of Everglades fish with hydrology using long-term databases from Everglades National Park: Florida International University, Miami, FL.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Final report to Everglades National Park under FIU Cooperative Agreement CA5280-8-9003
    Trexler, J. C. Loftus, W. F.; Jordan, F.; , 2001, Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fishes in the Florida Everglades: CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    in The Everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook

    J. W. Porter and K. G. Porter, editors


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    not available

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    not applicable


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Heather S. Henkel
    U.S. Geological Survey
    600 Fourth St. South
    St. Petersburg, FL 33701
    USA

    727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
    727 803-2030 (FAX)
    hhenkel@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Big Cypress National Preserve Fish Inventory & Monitoring Data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    No warrantees are implied or explicit for the data

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 01-Aug-2011
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Part 1: Biological Data Profile (FGDC-STD-001.1-1999)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/loftus_lh_fishes_04.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Mon Aug 01 22:08:46 2011