Joel Trexler (Florida International University)
We analyzed Everglades native and introduced fish diets to identify the most important invertebrate and plant prey, and to compare trophic positions of species within and among three habitats and two seasons (Fig. 1). We used the complementary techniques of stomach and stable isotope analysis for both instantaneous and time-integrated views of animal diets (Vander Zanden and Rasmussen 1996).
We then compared diet patterns in the temperate Everglades fish community with those from seasonal aquatic systems in the tropics. We posed the following hypotheses in examining those patterns:
1: Herbivory and omnivory are common trophic states in the Everglades.
2: Seasonal changes in diets within a habitat are usual .
3: Specialization in diet is common; generalists are rare.
4: Diet overlap is highest during high-water periods when food is plentiful.
This study is a first step in using data from across habitats and seasons for use in constructing a empirical food web for the Everglades marsh.
Kimmel, B. L.; Plosky, G. R.
The full article is available via journal subscription or single article purchase. The abstract may be viewed on the website below
Rasmussen, J. B.
The full article is available via journal subscription or single article purchase. The abstract may be viewed on the website below
The full article is available via journal subscription or single article purchase. The abstract may be viewed on the website below
Each species was separated into arbitrarily chosen size-groups of ~ 25 fish; length and wet mass recorded.
Volumes were measured to 0.001ml using a blood-sedimentation tube; volume of digested prey not reconstructed; The small size of food items required the pooling of like items from each size-class of fish for volumetric analysis.
Trophic Classification
We grouped fishes into 5 Trophic Classes using continuous scores (tau symboli ) based on sums of prey scores, multiplied by the proportion of diet comprised by each prey type (Adams et al. 1983; Winemiller 1990).
1 = Mainly Herbivorous, >50% plant material (Score = 1.0 -1.74);
2 = Omnivorous, 25-50% plant material (Score = 1.75-2.19);
3 = Omnivorous, <25% Plant material (Score = 2.20-2.74);
4 = Omnivorous, mostly animal prey (Score = 2.75-2.99);
5 = Predominantly carnivorous, fish and decapods (Score = >3.0).
The results were used to identify the most important invertebrate and plant prey and to compare trophic positions of species among and within 3 habitats (alligator pond, spike rush, and sawgrass) and two seasons (high-water and low-water periods).
This metadata record may have been copied from the SOFIA website and may not be the most recent version. Please check <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata> to be sure you have the most recent version.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather
Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Mon Nov 08 10:57:16 2010