USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Nutrients Data (Lietz)

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Nutrients Data (Lietz)
Abstract:
This project attempted to quantify nitrogen and phosphorus loads to Biscayne Bay based upon models developed from ordinary least squares regression techniques. It also examined which historical methods of sampling accurately represent nutrient concentrations in the water column of south Florida canals and can be used to calculate past nutrient loading. Also, water-quality trend analysis was conducted on data from two former National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) sites that have a direct impact on the south Florida ecosystem.

The data contain measurements for nitrogen organic total, nitrogen ammonia total, nitrogen AMM+ORG total, nitrogen nitrite total, nitrogen nitrate total, nitrogen nitrite+nitrate total, phosphorus total, and orthophosphorus total from 15 sites in Miami-Dade County. Data are available as separate files for each site or as data for all sites in one file in either Excel spreadsheets or tab-delimited text files.

Supplemental_Information: This project was completed on September 30, 1999.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Arthur C. Lietz (retired), 2001, Nutrients Data (Lietz).

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.431
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.156
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.933
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.358

  3. What does it look like?

    <http://sofia.usgs.gov/exchange/lietz/locationnuts.html> (GIF)
    location of data collection sites

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: Apr-1996
    Ending_Date: Oct-1997
    Currentness_Reference: Collection date

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: digital files

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      Indirect_Spatial_Reference: East Coast Canals
      This is a Point data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Point (15)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.1. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.1. Latitude and longitude values are specified in decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Parameters collected for each site include: nitrogen organic total, nitrogen ammonia total, nitrogen AMM+ORG total, nitrogen nitrite total, nitrogen nitrate total, nitrogen nitrite+nitrate total, phosphorus total, and orthophosphorus total
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: USGS


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Project personnel included Frank Panellas, student civil engineer, John Goebel and Elizabeth Debiak, hydrologic technicians.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Michael Byrne
    U.S. Geologcial Survey
    1400 Colonial Blvd.

    Suite 70, Royal Palm Square
    Fort Myers, FL 33907
    USA

    239 275-8448 ext. 10 (voice)
    239 275-6820 (FAX)
    mbyrne@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

The ecological health of bays and estuaries has become a matter of concern throughout the country. Biscayne Bay, which is a shallow, oligotrophic, subtropical estuary along the southeastern coast of Florida has been adversely impacted in certain locations by the increase in nutrient loads from tributary canals that have resulted from agricultural, urban, commercial and industrial processes. The ecological health of the Bay, as well as development of restoration efforts is dependent in part on understanding loads to the bay. This task was undertaken to determine nutrient loads from the canals discharging into Biscayne Bay National Park


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 1)
    During periods of flow, water samples were collected for the determination of nitrogen and phosphorus species that truly represent the stream cross-section. This was accomplished by collecting depth-integrated samples and point (grab) samples from mid-stream at 0.5- and 1.0-m depths for comparison. These samples were collected mostly upstream of the gated control structures at locations where most of the historical data were collected. Additionally, hydrologic data were collected concurrent with each sampling event for use in the determination of instantaneous discharge. Based on these data, statistical comparisons were made between point (grab) and depth-integrated samples, and models were developed to estimate total nitrogen and total phosphorus loads.

    Depth-integrated and point (grab) samples for nutrients were collected from the gated control structures at the east coast canal sites in Miami-Dade County during periods of flow. Most of the samples were collected near low tide when the gates at the sites usually are open. Depth-integrated samples were collected by means of the equal-width-increment method, which commonly is used when a discharge measurement is not made before sampling. In this method, the width of the stream is subdivided into equal-width intervals with a sampling vertical associated with each interval.

    In each cross section for the study, 8 to 10 verticals were used. The first vertical selected was half the distance of the first interval from the edge of the stream bank, and the other verticals were equally spaced apart across the stream from the first vertical. Because flow velocities of the east coast canals in Miami-Dade County are nearly always less than 2 ft/s (feet per second), the weighted-bottle method was used to collect each sample. The weighted bottle does not sample isokinetically (nozzle velocity equal to stream velocity); however, it can be used during low flows and when differences in water quality across the stream are believed to be insignificant. In the initial step, the vertical with the greatest velocity is selected; the weighted bottle is then lowered and raised at a constant rate so that it is not overfilled when returned to the surface. For each specific site, this transit rate was maintained throughout for all the verticals in the cross section, and a sample from each vertical was composited in a churn splitter for processing. The transit rate as well as the nozzle size was varied for each specific site in order to prevent overfilling of the bottle.

    During sample processing, the water in the churn was stirred by the churn disc at a rate of about 9 in/s (inches per second) to minimize error, with care being exercised to prevent the churn disc from breaking the surface. A total of 125 mL (milliliters) of this composite sample was siphoned off into an amber polyethylene bottle, chilled immediately, and within 48 hours was shipped to the USGS Water Quality Service Unit in Ocala, Fla., for analysis. The constituents determined were total organic nitrogen, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, nitrite plus nitrate nitrogen, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate. A point (grab) sample was collected concurrently with each depth-integrated sample. Point (grab) samples, depending on the site, were collected at 0.5 or 1.0 m below the surface near the centroid of flow by using a Niskin bottle. This bottle is spring loaded so that a messenger can trip it shut at the appropriate depth. After collection of the point (grab) sample, 125 mL of the sample was transferred from the Niskin bottle into an amber polyethylene bottle, chilled, and shipped for analysis according to protocol.

    Before each sampling trip, the Niskin bottle, weighted bottle, and churn splitter were cleaned with a dilute nonphosphate detergent and then rinsed with tap water followed by deionized water. Two rinses with native water were required for the samplers before sample collection at each east coast canal site. Between sampling sites, the samplers were rinsed with deionized water before being rinsed with native water.

    To ensure the integrity of the field data collected for the study, quality assurance samples (equipment blanks, field blanks, and split samples) were used extensively in the data-collection phase. Blank solutions essentially are samples free of the analytes being determined in the environmental samples. An equipment blank is a blank solution that is processed through all of the equipment used in the collection and processing of the environmental samples. Field blanks are actually equipment blanks done in the field and are subject to all aspects of the data-collection efforts as the environmental samples, including processing, preservation, transport, and laboratory handling. Two types of field and equipment blanks were used: one for the Niskin bottle and the other for the weighted bottle and churn splitter. These two field blank solutions consisted of inorganic blank water prepared at the USGS Water Quality Service Unit and were processed and analyzed according to protocol. Analytical results from the equipment blanks and field blanks indicated that most of the concentrations for the individual nitrogen and phosphorus species were below the detection limits for the analytical methods.

    Split samples were collected concurrently by the USGS and DERM to verify interlaboratory accuracy. The sampling data consisted of point (grab) samples that were collected from the same Niskin bottle by both agencies. The samples were sent to the USGS Water Quality Service Unit and to the DERM laboratory for analysis.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Michael Byrne
    U.S. Geologcial Survey
    1400 Colonial Blvd.

    Suite 70, Royal Palm Square
    Fort Myers, FL 33907
    USA

    239 275-8448 ext. 10 (voice)
    239 275-6820 (FAX)
    mbyrne@usgs.gov

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Lietz, A. C., 1999, Methodology for estimating nutrient loads discharged from the east coast Canals to Biscayne Bay, Miami-Dade County, Florida: Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4094, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Lietz, A. C., 2002, Feasibility of Estimating Constituent Concentrations and Loads Based on Data Recorded by Acoustic Instrumentation: USGS Open-File Report 02-285, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.

    Online Links:

    Lietz, A. C., 2000, Analysis of Water-Quality Trends at Two Discharge Stations - One within Big Cypress National Preserve and One near Biscayne Bay - Southern Florida, 1966-94: Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4099, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.

    Online Links:

    Lietz, A. C. Dixon, Joann; Byrne, Michae, 2002, Average altitude of the water table (1990-99) and frequency analysis of water levers (1974-99) in the Biscayne Aquifer, Miami-Dade County, Florida: USGS Open-File Report 02-91, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.

    Online Links:


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The positional accuracy of the sampling sites was determined using GPS techniques and published topographic maps.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Most of the sites have data from either 1996 or 1997. Snapper Creek Canal and Tamiami Canal have data from both 1996 and 1997. Data was collected mostly during April - October for each year.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    not applicable


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Heather S.Henkel
    U.S. Geological Survey
    600 Fourth St. South
    St. Petersburg, FL 33701
    USA

    727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
    727 803-2030 (FAX)
    hhenkel@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    lietz - nutrients data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    No warrantees are implied or explicit for the data

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 13-Mar-2009
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/Nut_Data_Lietz.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Fri Mar 13 14:21:41 2009