Poster presented April 2003, at the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Conference
By Benjamin F. McPherson1, Ronald L. Miller1, Robert Sobczak2, and Christine Bates2
1U.S. Geological Survey, Tampa, FL 2National Park Service, Ochopee, FL
| Water quality varies spatially across the region because of natural variations in geology, hydrology, and vegetation and because of differences in water management and land use. Although water quality in BICY and EVER is generally good, major physical alteration of the landscape and associated water management practices in the watershed have altered its quality.
The National Park Service (NPS) maintains hydrologic monitoring stations for measuring the water level (stage) and water quality in BICY and EVER (fig. 1). The data collected at these stations provide a historical baseline for assessing hydrologic conditions and making a wide range of management decisions. We have assessed selected water-quality data at these stations and at nearby canal sites for the period of record, 1959-2000, to define baseline conditions and to evaluate whether long-term trends have occurred. |
![]() |
| Figure 1 - Major features and sampling sites in Big Cypress National Preserve and Everglades National Park. [larger image] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Big Cypress Swamp [larger image] |
Taylor Slough [larger image] |
Everglades [larger image] |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 2-Chloride concentrations and loess smooth line at Taylor Slough Bridge and in Shark River Slough at P-33. [click on each of the graphs above to view a larger image] | ||
![]() |
| Figure 3-Total phosphorus concentration at P-33. [larger image] |
![]() |
| Figure 4-Total phosphorus concentration versus water level at P-33. [larger image] |
![]() |
| Figure 5-Water level at Bridge 105 on Tamiami Trail in BICY and concentrations of total phosphorus (have been multiplied times 1,000) and sulfate (have been multiplied times 100). [larger image] |
| Agricultural activities in south Florida | |
![]() [larger image] |
![]() [larger image] |
| Site | Number of detections by compounds | Number of determin- ations by compounds |
Detections per determin- ation |
Highest measured con- centration |
Lowest measured con- centration |
Aquatic life criteria | Number of exceed- ances |
Class III criteria, fresh- water |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine, unfiltered, g/L |
116 | 304 | 0.382 | 13.2 | 0.01 | 1.8 | 2 | |
| Atrazine, filtered, g/L |
90 | 99 | 0.909 | 0.87 | 0.00347 | 1.8 | 0 | |
| Metolachlor, filtered, g/L |
83 | 99 | 0.838 | 0.0635 | 0.0036 | 7.8 | ||
| Deethylatrazine, filtered, g/L |
73 | 99 | 0.737 | 0.0225 | 0.00107 | |||
| Tebuthiuron, filtered, g/L |
61 | 99 | 0.616 | 0.0494 | 0.0027 | 1.6 | 0 | |
| Endosulfan sulfate, unfiltered, g/L |
43 | 374 | 0.115 | 0.45 | 0.0033 | |||
| EPTC, filtered, g/L |
29 | 99 | 0.293 | 0.0148 | 0.00081 | |||
| 2, 6-Diethylaniline, filtered, g/L |
23 | 99 | 0.232 | 0.0054 | 0.00098 | |||
| Simazine, filtered, g/L |
20 | 99 | 0.202 | 0.0979 | 0.00361 | 10 | 0 | |
| Chlorpyrifos, filtered, g/L |
19 | 99 | 0.192 | 0.0234 | 0.00249 | |||
| Endosulfan I, unfiltered, g/L |
17 | 55 | 0.309 | 0.05 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.056 | |
| Malathion, filtered, g/L |
16 | 99 | 0.162 | 0.0837 | 0.00324 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Hexazinone, unfiltered, g/L |
15 | 153 | 0.098 | 0.031 | 0.019 |
Click here to download an 8.5 x 11 PDF version of the original poster (2.4 MB). PDF files require the Free Adobe Acrobat Reader ® to be read.
Related information:
SOFIA Project: Analysis of Historic Water-Quality Data
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/geer/2003/posters/wq_bicyever/print.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 05 November, 2003 @ 10:40 AM(TJE)