Poster presented April 2003, at the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Conference
Judson W. Harvey, Jessica T. Newlin, and Jungyill Choi1
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
1 - now at S.S. Papadopulos and Associates, Inc., Bethesda, MD
[ Disclaimer ]
As concerns over how to restore the Everglades intensify, the need to improve capabilities of surface-water flow models becomes increasingly important. One of the physical factors not often considered in surface flow modeling is the microtopography of the wetland surface. Microtopography affects the cross-sectional area of a wetland that is available for surface-water flow. As water levels decline seasonally, the tops of ridges and hummocks become exposed, making flow paths more sinuous, and therefore, increasing the resistance to surface flow. Microtopography also potentially affects the water budget and water quality due to water exchange that occurs between surface water and porewater in sediments.
At 1-meter horizontal scale, the elevation of the wetland surface undulates between hummocks associated with macrophytes and the depressions between them.
[larger image]
At 100-meter horizontal scale, topography varies between the tops of ridges and the bottom of nearby sloughs.
[larger image]
Microtopography data was collected at sites F1 and U3 in Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A), central Everglades.
Site F1 is dominated by cattail vegetation, and site U3 is dominated by sawgrass vegetation.
Surface-water flow direction is generally parallel with the research transect from spillway S10C toward site U3.
 [larger image] |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The type I tool did not penetrate the layer of flocculent organic matter, or "floc," that typically rests above the peat. This tool estimated the elevation of the top of the floc layer.
The type II tool penetrated the floc and rested on the peat because of its more open footprint. This tool estimated the elevation of the peat surface.
 [larger image] |
 [larger image] |
| Field measurements of microtopography were made near sites F1 and U3. The measurements were distributed so that variability of the wetland surface could be characterized for both 100-meter and 1-meter spatial scales. |  [larger image] |
The elevation of the peat surface varies 3-4 times more at the 100-meter scale compared with the 1-meter scale.
|
Horizontal Scale of Measurements |
2 Standard Deviations of the Peat Surface (cm) |
|
|---|---|---|
| F1 | U3 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| [click on the graphs above to view larger images] | ||
The inverse distribution function is a plot of the elevation of the peat or floc surface versus the probability of the occurrence when sampling at the 100-meter scale. The x-axis can be interpreted as the fraction of wetland cross-section that has an elevation equal to or less than a given elevation. (Kadlec, 1990).
|
|
The average wetland cross-section available for surface flow at a given surface-water level in the Everglades can be estimated from the microtopographic distribution function.
Ongoing work focuses on using the microtopography data and distributions in a surface-water flow model.
Microtopography measurements are being used in a modeling study of flow in WCA-2A to identify critical surface-water levels below which the microtopography becomes a dominant flow resistance factor.
Kadlec, Robert H. 1990. Overland flow in wetlands - vegetation resistance: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 691-706.
Click here to download an 8.5 x 11 PDF version of the original poster (596 KB). PDF files require the Free Adobe Acrobat Reader ® to be read.
Related information:
SOFIA Project: Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions and Relation to Water Quality in the Everglades
[ Disclaimer ]
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/geer/2003/posters/microtopo_char/print.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 03 January, 2005 @ 10:02 AM (KP)
